Re: ternary operator

[Steve Graegert <graegerts@gmail.com>]

On 6/28/05, Luiz Fernando Capitulino <lcapitulino@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> Steve Graegert wrote:
> 
> > Just take a look at our discussion about implicit return values on
> > int- and void-valued functions a week or two ago.  If no return value
> > is given explicitly it is undefined and in most cases not zero,
> > therfore not yielding false.  It's chosen randomly.
> 
> Yes, but note that this happens because the default return value
> for functions is 'int'. So, if you change func2()'s prototype to
> return 'void', the compiler will give you a warning.

Exactly what has been discussed by Glynn, me and others a couple of
days ago.  The reference to void-valued functions was made to reflect
the nature of the discussion that has taken place before; it has no
significance in this thread.

> PS: This is not the case for the arguments, in that case func2() it's
> able to accept anything (IIRC).

As stated in the answer to James Colannino's question on function prototyping.

Kind Regards

    \Steve

--

Steve Graegert <graegerts@gmail.com> || <http://www.technologies.de/~sg/>
Independent Software Consultant {C/C++ && Java && .NET}
Mobile: +49 (176)  21 24 88 69
Office: +49 (9131) 71 26 40 9