From: Andrea Cervesato via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: "Wei Gao" <wegao@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] mmapstress06: Rate limit page-dirtying loop to prevent MemCG OOM-kills
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 07:38:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a9680d9.9099b29d.2c53c3.ca0e@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apYysdNBmxPxyn3z@autotest-wegao.qe.prg2.suse.org>
Hi Wei,
> > Something as:
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/mmapstress/mmapstress06.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/mmapstress/mmapstress06.c
> > index 4e6023399..2c0c6fb02 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/mmapstress/mmapstress06.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/mmapstress/mmapstress06.c
> > @@ -59,8 +59,9 @@ static void run_test(void)
> >
> > for (size_t i = 0; i < map_size; i += page_size) {
> > mmapaddr[i] = 'a';
> > - if ((i % (2 * 1024 * 1024)) == 0)
> > - usleep(1000);
> > +
> > + if (i >= mem_limit && !(i % (2 * 1024 * 1024)))
> > + usleep(100000);
> > }
> >
> > The testrun increses to 6s from 1s but it makes the OOM very unlikely to
> > happen.
> Thanks for your suggestion.
> I have tested above solution in our openqa setup but still encounter failure, 3 test cases
> still failure with oom after run 100 cases. Maybe slow down dirty loop
> is still too late?
I still believe there's no way to avoid this, unless we re-implement the
OOM-killer or memory.reclaim mechanism increasing the amount of attempts
per request. We will always encounter hardware that is too slow that
won't swap memory fast enough for the test.
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 2:13 [LTP] [PATCH v1] mmapstress06: Rate limit page-dirtying loop to prevent MemCG OOM-kills Wei Gao via ltp
2026-08-25 3:00 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-08-25 12:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH v1] " Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-08-26 7:13 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-08-26 7:58 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-08-26 9:31 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-08-26 9:49 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-08-26 13:38 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-08-27 8:06 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-08-27 14:21 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-09-01 2:04 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-09-01 7:38 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp [this message]
2026-09-01 8:22 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-09-01 8:47 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-09-02 2:57 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] mmapstress06: Use memory.high in cgroup v2 to start swapping early Wei Gao via ltp
2026-09-02 8:28 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-09-04 8:53 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-09-04 10:23 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-09-04 10:43 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a9680d9.9099b29d.2c53c3.ca0e@mx.google.com \
--to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
--cc=wegao@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.