All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+d112d38ca13afed05225@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: a.hindborg@kernel.org, leitao@debian.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [fs?] possible deadlock in vfs_rmdir
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 23:35:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6aae2d3a.a6af0033.177e91.0000.GAE@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    587858367581 Merge tag 'nfsd-7.3-1' of git://git.kernel.or..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15b17df9580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=8c5c3949d762a91f
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d112d38ca13afed05225
compiler:       gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.44

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d900f083ada3/non_bootable_disk-58785836.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f8460d7438eb/vmlinux-58785836.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/551bf08b9af2/bzImage-58785836.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+d112d38ca13afed05225@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Tainted: G             L     
------------------------------------------------------
syz.7.1309/11230 is trying to acquire lock:

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802ee08600 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37){++++}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:1024 [inline]
ffff88802ee08600 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37){++++}-{4:4}, at: vfs_rmdir fs/namei.c:5500 [inline]
ffff88802ee08600 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37){++++}-{4:4}, at: vfs_rmdir+0xed/0x8a0 fs/namei.c:5488

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37){++++}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5942 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1d1/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5899
       down_write+0x8b/0x1f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1631
       inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:1024 [inline]
       configfs_depend_item_unlocked+0xf3/0x6a0 fs/configfs/dir.c:1268
       usbg_make_tpg+0x251/0x610 drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_tcm.c:1692
       target_fabric_make_tpg+0xab/0x8c0 drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c:947
       configfs_mkdir+0x525/0xd40 fs/configfs/dir.c:1369
       vfs_mkdir+0x364/0x850 fs/namei.c:5410
       filename_mkdirat+0x48b/0x5e0 fs/namei.c:5443
       __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:5470 [inline]
       __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:5467 [inline]
       __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6b/0x90 fs/namei.c:5467
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (tpg_instances_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5942 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1d1/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5899
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x1a4/0x1bd0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
       usbg_make_tpg+0x10b/0x610 drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_tcm.c:1669
       target_fabric_make_tpg+0xab/0x8c0 drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c:947
       configfs_mkdir+0x525/0xd40 fs/configfs/dir.c:1369
       vfs_mkdir+0x364/0x850 fs/namei.c:5410
       filename_mkdirat+0x48b/0x5e0 fs/namei.c:5443
       __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:5470 [inline]
       __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:5467 [inline]
       __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6b/0x90 fs/namei.c:5467
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&subsys->su_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       check_prev_add+0xeb/0xe60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3328 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3952 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x1528/0x1f40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5288
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5942 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1d1/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5899
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x1a4/0x1bd0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
       configfs_rmdir+0x5ae/0x950 fs/configfs/dir.c:1565
       vfs_rmdir fs/namei.c:5515 [inline]
       vfs_rmdir+0x328/0x8a0 fs/namei.c:5488
       filename_rmdir+0x31a/0x5c0 fs/namei.c:5572
       __do_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:5595 [inline]
       __se_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:5592 [inline]
       __x64_sys_rmdir+0x46/0x70 fs/namei.c:5592
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &subsys->su_mutex --> tpg_instances_lock --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37);
                               lock(tpg_instances_lock);
                               lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37);
  lock(&subsys->su_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

locks held by syz.7.1309/11230: 3, last CPU#2:
 #0: ffff8880245ba460 (sb_writers#24){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_rmdir+0x1ff/0x5c0 fs/namei.c:5561
 #1: ffff88802048d6c0 (&default_group_class[depth - 1]#7/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:1069 [inline]
 #1: ffff88802048d6c0 (&default_group_class[depth - 1]#7/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __start_dirop fs/namei.c:2918 [inline]
 #1: ffff88802048d6c0 (&default_group_class[depth - 1]#7/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: start_dirop fs/namei.c:2942 [inline]
 #1: ffff88802048d6c0 (&default_group_class[depth - 1]#7/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: filename_rmdir+0x258/0x5c0 fs/namei.c:5565
 #2: ffff88802ee08600 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37){++++}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:1024 [inline]
 #2: ffff88802ee08600 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37){++++}-{4:4}, at: vfs_rmdir fs/namei.c:5500 [inline]
 #2: ffff88802ee08600 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#37){++++}-{4:4}, at: vfs_rmdir+0xed/0x8a0 fs/namei.c:5488

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 11230 Comm: syz.7.1309 Tainted: G             L      syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Tainted: [L]=SOFTLOCKUP
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x190 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug.cold+0x178/0x1be kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2087
 check_noncircular+0x146/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2219
 check_prev_add+0xeb/0xe60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3328 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3952 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x1528/0x1f40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5288
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5942 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1d1/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5899
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x1a4/0x1bd0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
 configfs_rmdir+0x5ae/0x950 fs/configfs/dir.c:1565
 vfs_rmdir fs/namei.c:5515 [inline]
 vfs_rmdir+0x328/0x8a0 fs/namei.c:5488
 filename_rmdir+0x31a/0x5c0 fs/namei.c:5572
 __do_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:5595 [inline]
 __se_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:5592 [inline]
 __x64_sys_rmdir+0x46/0x70 fs/namei.c:5592
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fd86d19e159
Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fd86e109028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000054
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd86d425fa0 RCX: 00007fd86d19e159
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000200000001640
RBP: 00007fd86d23503b R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fd86d426038 R14: 00007fd86d425fa0 R15: 00007ffe2cf354b8
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-09-19  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6aae2d3a.a6af0033.177e91.0000.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+d112d38ca13afed05225@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.