[moderation/CI] Re: hfsplus: validate b-tree fork extents at mount and inode read

[syzbot ci <syzbot+ci64b8b93d66db86d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>]

syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v6] hfsplus: validate b-tree fork extents at mount and inode read
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260918085156.920842-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com
* [PATCH v6] hfsplus: validate b-tree fork extents at mount and inode read

and found the following issue:
kernel build error

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/1a9ef6de-01d7-4a6e-a590-94670355d046

***

kernel build error

tree:      vfs
URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
base:      33d280b462dfabeae3264b462d4e91339320be00
arch:      amd64
compiler:  Debian clang version 22.1.8 (++20260613092233+e80beda6e255-1~exp1~20260613092250.77), Debian LLD 22.1.8
config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/a34c3b73-64be-44d9-b975-48f355468b18/config

fs/hfsplus/inode.c:562:5: error: conflicting types for 'hfsplus_inode_read_fork'
fs/hfsplus/inode.c:571:11: error: call to undeclared function 'hfsplus_check_fork'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
fs/hfsplus/inode.c:574:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'HFSPLUS_I_CORRUPT_TREE'
fs/hfsplus/inode.c:580:33: error: use of undeclared identifier 'HFSPLUS_EXTENT_LAST_IDX'

***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
  Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

To test a fix for this bug, please reply with `#syz test`
(on a separate line) and attach the patch to the email.

Notes:
- The patch will be applied on top of the tested series (as an
  incremental fix).
- To test a new version of the whole series, please send it directly
  to syzbot@lists.linux.dev.
- Arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported.

The email will later be sent to:
[frank.li@vivo.com glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com slava@dubeyko.com syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream

If the report is a false positive, reply with
#syz invalid