From: syzbot <syzbot+300375dfd44665f063a6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-x25@vger.kernel.org, ms@dev.tdt.de,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [x25?] inconsistent lock state in x25_kill_by_neigh (2)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 17:03:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6acad256.a150a118.27e199.0030.GAE@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 602042bf29f6 Merge tag 'wq-for-7.3-rc6-fixes' of git://git..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13d66715580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=929e4854a828f434
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=300375dfd44665f063a6
compiler: gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.44
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=115d5f25580000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=146adff5580000
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d900f083ada3/non_bootable_disk-602042bf.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c804d2e9b640/vmlinux-602042bf.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d6cd162ae59e/bzImage-602042bf.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+300375dfd44665f063a6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
ksoftirqd/0/15 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
ffff88802c938260 (sk_lock-AF_X25){+.?.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline]
ffff88802c938260 (sk_lock-AF_X25){+.?.}-{0:0}, at: x25_kill_by_neigh+0x168/0x280 net/x25/af_x25.c:1778
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5942 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1d1/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5899
lock_sock_nested+0x41/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3837
lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline]
x25_bind+0x221/0x5c0 net/x25/af_x25.c:694
__sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1945 [inline]
__sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1937 [inline]
__sys_bind+0x1a9/0x260 net/socket.c:1976
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1981 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1979 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1979
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
irq event stamp: 357794
hardirqs last enabled at (357794): [<ffffffff81ca5245>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0x120 kernel/softirq.c:478
hardirqs last disabled at (357793): [<ffffffff81ca526e>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xce/0x120 kernel/softirq.c:455
softirqs last enabled at (357466): [<ffffffff81ca4d98>] run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:1099 [inline]
softirqs last enabled at (357466): [<ffffffff81ca4d98>] run_ksoftirqd+0x38/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:1091
softirqs last disabled at (357471): [<ffffffff81ca4d98>] run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:1099 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (357471): [<ffffffff81ca4d98>] run_ksoftirqd+0x38/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:1091
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(sk_lock-AF_X25);
<Interrupt>
lock(sk_lock-AF_X25);
*** DEADLOCK ***
locks held by ksoftirqd/0/15: 1, last CPU#0:
#0: ffffffff8edec5a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:309 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8edec5a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:849 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8edec5a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: netif_receive_skb_core+0x25/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:6321
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x190 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_usage_bug.part.0+0x258/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4086
print_usage_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4054 [inline]
valid_state kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4100 [inline]
mark_lock_irq kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4311 [inline]
mark_lock+0x956/0x1020 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4797
mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4686 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x7f1/0x1f40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5242
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5942 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1d1/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5899
lock_sock_nested+0x41/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3837
lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline]
x25_kill_by_neigh+0x168/0x280 net/x25/af_x25.c:1778
x25_lapb_receive_frame+0x4b1/0x1000 net/x25/x25_dev.c:138
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x1b2/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:6297
netif_receive_skb_core+0x5a/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:6322
lapbeth_napi_poll+0x42/0xc0 drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c:100
__napi_poll.constprop.0+0xaf/0x450 net/core/dev.c:7830
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:7893 [inline]
net_rx_action+0xa40/0xf20 net/core/dev.c:8050
handle_softirqs+0x1e6/0x9d0 kernel/softirq.c:645
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:1099 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x38/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:1091
smpboot_thread_fn+0x3d3/0xab0 kernel/smpboot.c:160
kthread+0x373/0x450 kernel/kthread.c:436
ret_from_fork+0x730/0xd60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
</TASK>
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:3839
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 15, name: ksoftirqd/0
preempt_count: 100, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
Preemption disabled at:
[<ffffffff81ca41d3>] softirq_handle_begin kernel/softirq.c:486 [inline]
[<ffffffff81ca41d3>] handle_softirqs+0xf3/0x9d0 kernel/softirq.c:621
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x190 lib/dump_stack.c:120
__might_resched.cold+0x1dc/0x222 kernel/sched/core.c:9264
lock_sock_nested+0x52/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3839
lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1713 [inline]
x25_kill_by_neigh+0x168/0x280 net/x25/af_x25.c:1778
x25_lapb_receive_frame+0x4b1/0x1000 net/x25/x25_dev.c:138
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x1b2/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:6297
netif_receive_skb_core+0x5a/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:6322
lapbeth_napi_poll+0x42/0xc0 drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c:100
__napi_poll.constprop.0+0xaf/0x450 net/core/dev.c:7830
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:7893 [inline]
net_rx_action+0xa40/0xf20 net/core/dev.c:8050
handle_softirqs+0x1e6/0x9d0 kernel/softirq.c:645
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:1099 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x38/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:1091
smpboot_thread_fn+0x3d3/0xab0 kernel/smpboot.c:160
kthread+0x373/0x450 kernel/kthread.c:436
ret_from_fork+0x730/0xd60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 0:03 syzbot [this message]
2026-10-14 11:14 ` Forwarded: inconsistent lock state in x25_kill_by_neigh (2) syzbot
2026-10-14 11:15 ` syzbot
[not found] <CAFJkwZxEecAizR2Onef19ss4F8jcig41Robzud4ASpi1J+zxrA@mail.gmail.com>
2026-10-14 22:59 ` [syzbot] [x25?] " syzbot
[not found] <CAFJkwZyYvooJO5gz0_16L8bFwxnHwHC0ZFbDJL-q_2KPPZ0_kA@mail.gmail.com>
2026-10-14 23:01 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6acad256.a150a118.27e199.0030.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot+300375dfd44665f063a6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-x25@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ms@dev.tdt.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.