From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/10] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:21:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ad6f42a-e3e0-4c13-859c-07f5e7bd5ec8@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205201107.GA21808@frogsfrogsfrogs>
>> if (iomi.pos >= dio->i_size ||
>> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
>> index 75bf54e76f3b..0a0b6798f517 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
>> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ struct vm_fault;
>> *
>> * IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY indicates that I/O and I/O completions for this iomap must
>> * never be merged with the mapping before it.
>> + *
>> + * IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_COW indicates that we require atomic CoW end IO handling.
>
> It more indicates that the filesystem is using copy on write to handle
> an untorn write, and will provide the ioend support necessary to commit
> the remapping atomically, right?
yes, correct
>
>> */
>> #define IOMAP_F_NEW (1U << 0)
>> #define IOMAP_F_DIRTY (1U << 1)
>> @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ struct vm_fault;
>> #endif /* CONFIG_BUFFER_HEAD */
>> #define IOMAP_F_XATTR (1U << 5)
>> #define IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY (1U << 6)
>> +#define IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_COW (1U << 7)
>>
>> /*
>> * Flags set by the core iomap code during operations:
>> @@ -183,6 +186,7 @@ struct iomap_folio_ops {
>> #define IOMAP_DAX 0
>> #endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */
>> #define IOMAP_ATOMIC (1 << 9)
>> +#define IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW (1 << 10)
>
> What does IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW do? There's no description for it (or for
> IOMAP_ATOMIC).
I'll add a description for both.
> Can you have IOMAP_ATOMIC and IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW both set?
Yes
> Or are they mutually exclusive?
I am not thinking that it might be neater to have a distinct flag for
IOMAP_ATOMIC when we want to try an atomic bio - maybe IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW
or IOMAP_ATOMIC_BIO? And then also IOMAP_DIO_ATOMIC_BIO (in addition to
IOMAP_DIO_ATOMIC_COW).
>
> I'm guessing from the code that ATOMIC_COW requires ATOMIC to be set,
> but I wonder why because there's no documentation update in the header
> files or in Documentation/filesystems/iomap/.
Will do.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 12:01 [PATCH RFC 00/10] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-02-05 19:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:35 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes John Garry
2025-02-05 20:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 11:21 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-02-06 21:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] xfs: Make xfs_find_trim_cow_extent() public John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] xfs: iomap " John Garry
2025-02-05 20:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 11:10 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:48 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-02-05 19:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:43 ` John Garry
2025-02-10 16:59 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-02-05 19:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:27 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:52 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-02-05 19:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 9:15 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:53 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-02-05 19:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 8:10 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ad6f42a-e3e0-4c13-859c-07f5e7bd5ec8@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.