Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: ignore unused/unreliable fields in set_eee op

[Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>]

On 21.02.2024 16:41, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:24:40AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> This function is used with the set_eee() ethtool operation. Certain
>> fields of struct ethtool_keee() are relevant only for the get_eee()
>> operation. In addition, in case of the ioctl interface, we have no
>> guarantee that userspace sends sane values in struct ethtool_eee.
>> Therefore explicitly ignore all fields not needed for set_eee().
>> This protects from drivers trying to use unchecked and unreliable
>> data, relying on specific userspace behavior.
>>
>> Note: Such unsafe driver behavior has been found and fixed in the
>> tg3 driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 7 -------
>>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>> index 1763e8b69..ff28c113b 100644
>> --- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>> @@ -1513,20 +1513,13 @@ static void eee_to_keee(struct ethtool_keee *keee,
>>  {
>>  	memset(keee, 0, sizeof(*keee));
>>  
>> -	keee->supported_u32 = eee->supported;
>>  	keee->advertised_u32 = eee->advertised;
>> -	keee->lp_advertised_u32 = eee->lp_advertised;
> 
> This overlaps with the last patch in my series, which removes all the
> _u32 members from keee. They are no longer used at the end of my
> series. I added this removal patch because i kept missing a _u32, and
> i wanted the compiler to tell me.
> 
Ah, didn't see this. Then I'll wait for your series to be applied,
afterwards will check whether parts of my patch are still applicable.

> 	Andrew

Heiner