From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:43:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bd3d2df-8a21-40df-08c3-e9eaaa5000fe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1666203642.git.remckee0@gmail.com>
On 19.10.22 20:34, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> These patches add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(). There are two
> sets of tests: range tests and NUMA tests. The range tests use a normal
> (i.e., UMA) simulated physical memory and set the nid to NUMA_NO_NODE. The
> NUMA tests use a simulated physical memory that is set up with multiple
> NUMA nodes. Additionally, most of the NUMA tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
> For the range tests, the TEST_F_EXACT flag is used to run the same set of
> range tests used for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(). The NUMA tests have the
> same setup as the corresponding test for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(), but
> several of the memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests fail to allocate
> memory in setups where the memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test would
> allocate memory. Also, some memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests drop the
> lower limit of the requested range in order to allocate within the
> requested node, but the same setup in a memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test
> allocates within the requested range.
Thanks a lot Rebecca for moving forward with these changes even after
your Outreachy internship ended!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-31 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 18:34 [PATCH v3 0/5] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] memblock tests: introduce range " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 10:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-03 4:02 ` Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] memblock tests: add top-down NUMA " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 10:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] memblock tests: add bottom-up " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 10:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] memblock tests: add generic " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 12:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] memblock tests: remove completed TODO item Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 5:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 8:43 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-10-31 12:43 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bd3d2df-8a21-40df-08c3-e9eaaa5000fe@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=remckee0@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.