All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau at linux.intel.com>
To: mptcp at lists.01.org
Subject: [MPTCP] Re: [MPTCP][PATCH mptcp-next 3/4] selftests: mptcp: add cfg_do_w for cfg_remove
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:59:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c18382c-5ee3-fb92-e44a-7f792f962af@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4bd05617494686e9dabaf4b0a0e12b475a7529ce.1613965565.git.geliangtang@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2066 bytes --]

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Geliang Tang wrote:

> In some testcases, we need to slow down the transmitting process. This
> patch added a new argument named cfg_do_w for cfg_remove to allow the
> caller to pass an argument to cfg_remove.
>
> In do_rnd_write, use this cfg_do_w to control the transmitting speed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang(a)gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_connect.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_connect.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_connect.c
> index 77bb62feb872..533c3d8dc1cd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_connect.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_connect.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static int cfg_sndbuf;
> static int cfg_rcvbuf;
> static bool cfg_join;
> static bool cfg_remove;
> +static unsigned int cfg_do_w;
> static int cfg_wait;
>
> static void die_usage(void)
> @@ -272,8 +273,8 @@ static size_t do_rnd_write(const int fd, char *buf, const size_t len)
> 	if (cfg_join && first && do_w > 100)
> 		do_w = 100;
>
> -	if (cfg_remove && do_w > 50)
> -		do_w = 50;
> +	if (cfg_remove && do_w > cfg_do_w)
> +		do_w = cfg_do_w;
>
> 	bw = write(fd, buf, do_w);
> 	if (bw < 0)
> @@ -829,7 +830,7 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> 	int c;
>
> -	while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "6jrlp:s:hut:m:S:R:w:")) != -1) {
> +	while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "6jr:lp:s:hut:m:S:R:w:")) != -1) {
> 		switch (c) {
> 		case 'j':
> 			cfg_join = true;
> @@ -840,6 +841,7 @@ static void parse_opts(int argc, char **argv)
> 			cfg_remove = true;
> 			cfg_mode = CFG_MODE_POLL;
> 			cfg_wait = 400000;
> +			cfg_do_w = atoi(optarg);

Even though this program is only driven by the test scripts, I think it 
would still be good to do a sanity check on the value of cfg_do_w. At 
least make sure it's greater than zero?

> 			break;
> 		case 'l':
> 			listen_mode = true;
> -- 
> 2.29.2

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

                 reply	other threads:[~2021-02-23  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6c18382c-5ee3-fb92-e44a-7f792f962af@linux.intel.com \
    --to=unknown@example.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.