From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=anoo@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47CR0s0MZtzF5ZM; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 11:52:44 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAD0lBYw026057; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:52:41 -0500 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w85h4ub37-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:52:41 -0500 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAD0nfoE030314; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:52:40 -0500 Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w85h4ub2s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:52:40 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAD0juNs014884; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:52:39 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2w5n36bkqc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:52:39 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xAD0qccs47841692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:52:38 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB6AAE05C; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:52:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C9AAE060; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:52:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltc.linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.16.170.189]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:52:37 +0000 (GMT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 18:54:13 -0600 From: Adriana Kobylak To: Gunnar Mills Cc: "Alexander A. Filippov" , openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, jandraara@gmail.com, openbmc Subject: Re: Packaging and deploying multiple firmware image types in one In-Reply-To: References: <20191112074921.GA4938@bbwork.lan> Message-ID: <6cd66e8841aedf1b7a0508cd19ef8e4e@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Sender: anoo@linux.ibm.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.1 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-12_09:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1910280000 definitions=main-1911130000 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:52:45 -0000 On 2019-11-12 15:38, Gunnar Mills wrote: > On 11/12/2019 1:49 AM, Alexander A. Filippov wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:28:11PM -0600, Adriana Kobylak wrote: >> >> We use the system bundle of BMC + Host firmware on our VESNIN >> hardware. >> There are some things which cause discomfort a little bit: >> - The uploaded system bundle isn't shown in the WebUI. > > IBM is planning on supporting a bundled "System" firmware form the > WebUI. > The design is here: > https://ibm.invisionapp.com/share/4XNZ0JAMJ7B#/screens/319215228 > Maybe in the mean time we can have the WebUI display the "System" versions alongside the "BMC" ones. I'll check if it's as simple as "if purpose is BMC or System" do what it currently does. >>> [3] >>> https://github.com/openbmc/meta-openpower/blob/master/recipes-phosphor/flash/host-fw_git.bb >>>