From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] io_uring: add fsetxattr and setxattr support
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:27:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ce7133b-802f-74cf-7610-a7b0bbbb45fd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211215221702.3695098-5-shr@fb.com>
On 12/15/21 22:17, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> This adds support to io_uring for the fsetxattr and setxattr API.
Apart from potentially putname comment,
Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
> ---
> fs/io_uring.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 6 +-
> 2 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 5092dfe56da6..fc2239635342 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
[...]> +static int __io_setxattr_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
> + const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
> + struct user_namespace *user_ns)
> +{
> + struct io_xattr *ix = &req->xattr;
> + const char __user *name;
> + void *ret;
> +
> + if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (unlikely(sqe->ioprio))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (unlikely(req->flags & REQ_F_FIXED_FILE))
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + ix->filename = NULL;
> + name = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
> + ix->ctx.value = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr2));
> + ix->ctx.size = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
> + ix->ctx.flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->xattr_flags);
> +
> + ix->ctx.kname = kmalloc(XATTR_NAME_MAX + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ix->ctx.kname)
> + return -ENOMEM;> + ix->ctx.kname_sz = XATTR_NAME_MAX + 1;
Might make sense to let the userspace specify kname size, but
depends what is the average name length and how much of free
space we have in io_xattr
[...]
> +static int io_setxattr(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> + struct io_xattr *ix = &req->xattr;
> + unsigned int lookup_flags = LOOKUP_FOLLOW;
> + struct path path;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +retry:
> + ret = do_user_path_at_empty(AT_FDCWD, ix->filename, lookup_flags, &path);
> + putname(ix->filename);
It putname() multiple times on retry, how does it work?
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = __io_setxattr(req, issue_flags, &path);
> + path_put(&path);
> + if (retry_estale(ret, lookup_flags)) {
> + lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_REVAL;
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
> + kfree(ix->ctx.kname);
> +
> + if (ix->value)
> + kvfree(ix->value);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + req_set_fail(req);
> +
> + io_req_complete(req, ret);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]
>
> printk_once(KERN_WARNING "io_uring: unhandled opcode %d\n",
> @@ -6715,6 +6870,15 @@ static void io_clean_op(struct io_kiocb *req)
> putname(req->hardlink.oldpath);
> putname(req->hardlink.newpath);
> break;
> + case IORING_OP_SETXATTR:
> + if (req->xattr.filename)
> + putname(req->xattr.filename);
> + fallthrough;
> + case IORING_OP_FSETXATTR:
> + kfree(req->xattr.ctx.kname);
> + if (req->xattr.value)
> + kvfree(req->xattr.value);
nit: it's slow path and kvfree() handles NULLs, so we don't
really need NULL checks here.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-21 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-15 22:16 [PATCH v4 0/5] io_uring: add xattr support Stefan Roesch
2021-12-15 22:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] fs: split off do_user_path_at_empty from user_path_at_empty() Stefan Roesch
2021-12-15 22:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] fs: split off setxattr_setup function from setxattr Stefan Roesch
2021-12-15 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] fs: split off do_getxattr from getxattr Stefan Roesch
2021-12-15 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] io_uring: add fsetxattr and setxattr support Stefan Roesch
2021-12-21 17:27 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-12-15 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] io_uring: add fgetxattr and getxattr support Stefan Roesch
2021-12-21 17:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ce7133b-802f-74cf-7610-a7b0bbbb45fd@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shr@fb.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.