From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "sashiko-bot@kernel.org" <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Reload MMU on *every* page pre-fault attempt/iteration
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 19:04:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d8ac2f9487e5a00745be5fadac3f83679cae99f.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806214050.78058-2-seanjc@google.com>
On Thu, 2026-08-06 at 14:40 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Reload the MMU (which is a nop if the MMU doesn't need to be reloaded) on
> every attempt to pre-fault a guest page, i.e. when the page fault path
> signals that the caller should retry. If the synchronize_srcu_expedited()
> in kvm_invalidate_memslot() completes before kvm_vcpu_pre_fault_memory()
> grabs SRCU, but kvm_mmu_reload() in the pre-fault path completes before
> kvm_invalidate_memslot() triggers x86's "fast zap all", then the pre-fault
> task will reach kvm_tdp_page_prefault() with an invalid root.
>
> Attempting to fault-in memory with an invalid root ultimately puts
> kvm_tdp_page_prefault() into an infinite (breakable) retry loop, which
> manifests most obviously as a hang in the pre_fault_memory_test selftest,
> but also eventually causes RCU (SRCU?) to complain.
>
> INFO: rcu_tasks detected stalls on tasks:
> 000000000cda47bd: .. nvcsw: 6/6 holdout: 1 idle_cpu: -1/25
> task:pre_fault_memor state:R running task stack:12696
> pid:95588 tgid:95588 ppid:95584 task_flags:0x400000 flags:0x00080801
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> lock_release+0x4e/0x320
> __get_user_pages+0x546/0xcd0
> up_read+0x1b/0x30
> get_user_pages_unlocked+0xee/0x350
> hva_to_pfn+0xd3/0x3d0 [kvm]
> lock_release+0x4e/0x320
> xa_load+0x5c/0x170
> xa_load+0x14c/0x170
> __kvm_faultin_pfn+0xd9/0x130 [kvm]
> lock_acquire+0x65/0x2b0
> lock_release+0x4e/0x320
> kvm_mmu_faultin_pfn+0x1e1/0x690 [kvm]
> gup_fast_fallback+0x63e/0xdf0
> kvm_tdp_page_fault+0xeb/0x140 [kvm]
> kvm_mmu_do_page_fault+0x12e/0x200 [kvm]
> kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory+0x16e/0x200 [kvm]
> kvm_vcpu_pre_fault_memory+0xc1/0x1f0 [kvm]
> kvm_vcpu_pre_fault_memory+0x116/0x1f0 [kvm]
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3a4/0x6b0 [kvm]
> clockevents_program_event+0x5d/0x170
> __se_sys_ioctl+0x6d/0xb0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
> do_syscall_64+0x10a/0x480
> __irq_exit_rcu+0x8e/0x140
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
> </TASK>
>
> Fixes: 6e01b7601dfe ("KVM: x86: Implement kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory()")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
But, did you hit this somehow with an unmodified test and kernel? The log makes
me think it was hit in a normal test run. (which I failed to reproduce)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 21:40 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix pre-fault and map private loops Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Reload MMU on *every* page pre-fault attempt/iteration Sean Christopherson
2026-08-07 8:58 ` Huang, Kai
2026-08-07 19:04 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2026-08-07 19:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Harden "map private PFN" against unexpected root invalidation Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 22:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 22:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-07 20:26 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-08-07 22:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Top-up memory caches when retrying "map private PFN" Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 22:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-07 20:38 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-08-07 22:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Add sanity check to detect stale page faults in " Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 22:12 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d8ac2f9487e5a00745be5fadac3f83679cae99f.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.