All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/HMAT: Fix the parsing of Cache Associativity and Write Policy
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:04:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6dbcdaff-feae-68b9-006d-dd8aec032553@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hqjR5EdrxcdkLUpxseFiizqNjtA3nYdDtZiSt85JiywQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/9/2019 6:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 8:03 AM Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> In chapter 5.2.27.5, Table 5-147: Field "Cache Attributes" of
>> ACPI 6.3 spec: 0 is "None", 1 is "Direct Mapped", 2 is "Complex Cache
>> Indexing" for Cache Associativity; 0 is "None", 1 is "Write Back",
>> 2 is "Write Through" for Write Policy.
> 
> Well, I'm not sure what the connection between the above statement,
> which is correct AFAICS, and the changes made by the patch is.
> 
> Is that the *_OTHER symbol names are confusing or something deeper?
> 

Because in include/acpi/actbl1.h:

#define ACPI_HMAT_CA_NONE                     (0)

ACPI_HMAT_CA_NONE is 0, but in include/linux/node.h:

    enum cache_indexing {
           NODE_CACHE_DIRECT_MAP,
           NODE_CACHE_INDEXED,
           NODE_CACHE_OTHER,
    };
NODE_CACHE_OTHER is 2, and for otner enum:

          case ACPI_HMAT_CA_DIRECT_MAPPED:
                  tcache->cache_attrs.indexing = NODE_CACHE_DIRECT_MAP;
                  break;
          case ACPI_HMAT_CA_COMPLEX_CACHE_INDEXING:
                  tcache->cache_attrs.indexing = NODE_CACHE_INDEXED;
                  break;
in include/acpi/actbl1.h:

  #define ACPI_HMAT_CA_DIRECT_MAPPED            (1)
  #define ACPI_HMAT_CA_COMPLEX_CACHE_INDEXING   (2)

but in include/linux/node.h:

NODE_CACHE_DIRECT_MAP is 0, NODE_CACHE_INDEXED is 1. This is incorrect. 
And same for enum cache_write_policy.

>> Signed-off-by: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 4 ++--
>>   include/linux/node.h     | 4 ++--
>>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
>> index 2c32cfb72370..719d0279563d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
>> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static __init int hmat_parse_cache(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>>                  break;
>>          case ACPI_HMAT_CA_NONE:
>>          default:
>> -               tcache->cache_attrs.indexing = NODE_CACHE_OTHER;
>> +               tcache->cache_attrs.indexing = NODE_CACHE_NONE;
>>                  break;
>>          }
>>
>> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static __init int hmat_parse_cache(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>>                  break;
>>          case ACPI_HMAT_CP_NONE:
>>          default:
>> -               tcache->cache_attrs.write_policy = NODE_CACHE_WRITE_OTHER;
>> +               tcache->cache_attrs.write_policy = NODE_CACHE_WRITE_NONE;
>>                  break;
>>          }
>>          list_add_tail(&tcache->node, &target->caches);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
>> index 4866f32a02d8..6dbd764d09ce 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/node.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/node.h
>> @@ -36,15 +36,15 @@ struct node_hmem_attrs {
>>   };
>>
>>   enum cache_indexing {
>> +       NODE_CACHE_NONE,
>>          NODE_CACHE_DIRECT_MAP,
>>          NODE_CACHE_INDEXED,
>> -       NODE_CACHE_OTHER,
>>   };
>>
>>   enum cache_write_policy {
>> +       NODE_CACHE_WRITE_NONE,
>>          NODE_CACHE_WRITE_BACK,
>>          NODE_CACHE_WRITE_THROUGH,
>> -       NODE_CACHE_WRITE_OTHER,
>>   };
>>
>>   /**


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-10  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-02  7:03 [PATCH] ACPI/HMAT: Fix the parsing of Cache Associativity and Write Policy Tao Xu
2019-12-09  7:43 ` Tao Xu
2019-12-09  7:55   ` Greg KH
2019-12-09  8:38     ` Tao Xu
2019-12-09 10:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-10  1:04   ` Tao Xu [this message]
2019-12-10  8:06     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-10  8:19       ` Tao Xu
2019-12-10  8:27         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-10 13:18           ` Tao Xu
2019-12-11  3:04             ` Tao Xu
2019-12-11  3:37               ` Dan Williams
2019-12-11  4:27                 ` Tao Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6dbcdaff-feae-68b9-006d-dd8aec032553@intel.com \
    --to=tao3.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.