From: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, neeraju@codeaurora.org
Subject: Query: Regarding Notifier chain callback debugging or profiling
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:26:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e077b43-6c9e-3f4e-e079-db438e36a4eb@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82d5b63e-4ae6-fb5f-8a1c-2d5755db2638@codeaurora.org>
Hi,
In Linux kernel, everywhere we are using notification chains to notify
for any kernel events, But we don't have any debugging or profiling
mechanism to know which callback is taking time or currently we are
stuck on which call back(without dumps it is difficult to say for last
problem)
Below are the few ways, which we can implement to profile callback on
need basis:
1) Use trace event before and after callback:
static int notifier_call_chain(struct notifier_block **nl,
unsigned long val, void *v,
int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls)
{
int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
struct notifier_block *nb, *next_nb;
+ trace_event for entry of callback
ret = nb->notifier_call(nb, val, v);
+ trace_event for exit of callback
}
return ret;
}
2) Or use pr_debug instead of trace_event
3) Both of the above approach has certain problems, like it will dump
callback for each notifier chain, which might flood trace buffer or dmesg.
So we can use bool variable to control that and dump the required
notification chain only.
Some thing like below we can use:
struct srcu_notifier_head {
struct mutex mutex;
struct srcu_struct srcu;
struct notifier_block __rcu *head;
+ bool debug_callback;
};
static int notifier_call_chain(struct notifier_block **nl,
unsigned long val, void *v,
- int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls)
+ int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls, bool
debug_callback)
{
int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
struct notifier_block *nb, *next_nb;
@@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct
srcu_notifier_head *nh)
if (init_srcu_struct(&nh->srcu) < 0)
BUG();
nh->head = NULL;
+ nh->debug_callback = false; -> by default it would be false for
every notifier chain.
4) we can also think of something pre and post function, before and
after each callback, And we can enable only for those who wants to profile.
Please let us what approach we can use, or please suggest some debugging
mechanism for the same.
Regards
Gaurav
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-10 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <82d5b63e-4ae6-fb5f-8a1c-2d5755db2638@codeaurora.org>
2020-02-10 11:56 ` Gaurav Kohli [this message]
2020-02-10 21:06 ` Query: Regarding Notifier chain callback debugging or profiling Greg KH
2020-02-11 4:46 ` Gaurav Kohli
2020-02-11 12:20 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e077b43-6c9e-3f4e-e079-db438e36a4eb@codeaurora.org \
--to=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.