From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3D1CC982D0 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:01:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=xYnLi3KwvYUOTG+qFfRt4ovqKtaUombElJPtjd+u6gY=; b=mMXMiz7h26xYLSDMwtgYupYsLM q+xTw9J/VGgJzzn68yud4B09Vv/mMxo+CFFrXdD5Mrx6+vosUfJbV+MPwE6pNUQZVVOAZtwoOrCgk u36xqggIvsHQw8fjz1AoYdRZWorNljACNKsnJqYR5C7zWO2F4bim4QJWD0VragMLZCLmaz56+TLDk nXVGnoAAmNaXLnDhyQ+FjroPjZL4tqWQOIZOTEfIAKVYn2PQ1klBzaZZEGrgYdHVYLb6LcmKiO2Ox wcWpVwKRiZJJJrtY/FCuy10lqI2MwMtEkbnkTmHIGB217Bf0Rmd31Ldu36fl1XMDfwK0YVbWn0dOW hSJHSGqQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x78vz-0000000B3nC-43eV; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:01:39 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x78vx-0000000B3mV-49E4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:01:39 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5102E1476; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 03:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.74.102] (unknown [10.57.74.102]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CE963F7B4; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 03:01:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1789639295; bh=1pwwAA8ZeOmKPOIlnHk+XRlZJTnA6zBlBTY2TxR85cU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=SvAAG4W6pCrBYl8UpXFPHTB71j6RSyCdPuWmd6UkpE0cOM3aNKMGhTZAlgIGEB7fV Cd4IX/FcwNi0bAPpT+dbXe03++P3TJBX21zD+nSnKRWo8w05d+mhGf6NjzzytfXlME YQWqbo5gb1j49X8rnLzxfNNa3piSKywqbAZlc1EM= Message-ID: <6f2907ec-848e-4e60-98b2-a3b7a905b880@arm.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 12:01:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: topology: fix arch_freq_get_on_cpu() overflow above 4.19 GHz To: Oleg Keri Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Sumit Gupta , Prasanna Kumar T S M , Beata Michalska , Russell King , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Sudeep Holla , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <55538466-2203-42ec-a0bd-b743c04a3b38@arm.com> <178955779940.30466.10860982419496123467@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: Dietmar Eggemann In-Reply-To: <178955779940.30466.10860982419496123467@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260917_030138_075559_55C2DA57 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.03 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Oleg, On 16.09.26 13:23, Oleg Keri wrote: > Hi Dietmar, > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2026, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: [...] > Fine by me, that reads better than open-coding the shift. Your diff > builds here on arm64 (topology.o and kernel/sched/), so I will fold it > into v4 and add the scheduler maintainers to Cc for the header move. > > Since the diff is yours: is a Suggested-by enough, or would you rather > have Co-developed-by and your Signed-off-by on the patch? Don't worry, I will give my 'Reviewed-By' for the final version.