From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring) Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:54:37 +0200 Subject: [Cocci] Improvements for building the Coccinelle software In-Reply-To: <206bb944-e03a-7ad4-ce46-c0c412e09ff6@suse.de> References: <20160523211952.GY11948@wotan.suse.de> <20160523214931.GA11948@wotan.suse.de> <541922c4-84ae-cc7c-4baf-dbd7ace43961@suse.de> <1361a24e-9dc5-db4f-d347-370db8d126dc@users.sourceforge.net> <20160524200828.GA7425@suse.de> <81317386-8795-453e-713c-08911161c2b6@users.sourceforge.net> <20160524205926.GA15029@suse.de> <1ad1bd94-7e35-e12e-c123-85c5700a659d@users.sourceforge.net> <206bb944-e03a-7ad4-ce46-c0c412e09ff6@suse.de> Message-ID: <6f448674-7488-dacd-b9cb-c4a855a2b577@users.sourceforge.net> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr >> Will it be interesting to look at the circumstances under which this >> update candidate was found? > > Just read the configure output?! Did any other software builder stumble also on such an open issues in the years before? How will the build scripts evolve further? Regards, Markus