All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samir M <samir@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] hugemmap: Migrate alloc-instantiate-race test from libhugetlbfs
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 22:31:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f6fff2f-2b56-429d-8b60-c6ea520cf0e4@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818202730.9105-1-linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com>


On 19/08/26 1:57 am, linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Samir,
>
> On August 18, 2026, Samir Mulani wrote:
>> hugemmap: Migrate alloc-instantiate-race test from libhugetlbfs
>> Migrate the alloc-instantiate-race.c test from libhugetlbfs [1] to LTP
>> as hugemmap36.
> Could this be corrected to hugemmap42, which is the test added by this
> patch?
Yes, fixed the commit message. It now correctly says hugemmap42. updated 
in patch v7
>> +hugemmap42 hugemmap42
> Could a second runtest entry exercise "-m private"? Without an option,
> setup() defaults to MAP_SHARED, so the new pthread path is not run by the
> hugetlb suite.
Yes, added a second entry in runtest/hugetlb: updated in patch v7
>> +	err = sched_setaffinity(getpid(), mask_size, cpuset);
> Could this pass 0 as the pid? sched_setaffinity() applies the mask to the
> thread ID supplied in pid. In the MAP_PRIVATE path, getpid() identifies the
> thread-group leader for both pthreads, so both racers change the main
> thread's affinity and remain unpinned.
Yes, fixed. Changed getpid() to 0.
With getpid(), both pthreads return the same thread-group ID, so both 
were pinning the main thread instead of themselves. Using 0 means "apply 
to the calling thread", which is correct for both the fork and pthread 
cases.
>> +	p_sync = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, (totpages - 1) * hpage_size,
>> +			   PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd_sync, 0);
>> +
>> +	run_race(race_type);
> Could each hugepage in p_sync be written before run_race()? mmap() without
> MAP_POPULATE does not fault these pages in. Consequently all free hugepages
> remain available to the racers instead of only the final page, and the
> allocation race is not exercised. The source test explicitly touches each
> page for this reason.
Yes, fixed. Added a loop that writes one byte to each sync page before 
calling run_race():

for (unsigned long i = 0; i < totpages - 1; i++) {
     volatile char *cp = (volatile char *)p_sync + i * hpage_size;
     *cp = 0;
}
Without this, mmap() does not actually take hugepages from the pool (no 
MAP_POPULATE), so all pages were still free when the race started and 
the race condition was never triggered. This was the most important fix.
>> +	if (p_sync != MAP_FAILED) {
>> +		unsigned long totpages = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO(MEMINFO_HPAGE_FREE);
>> +
>> +		SAFE_MUNMAP(p_sync, totpages * tst_get_hugepage_size());
>> +	}
> Could the exact length passed to mmap() be saved and reused here? The
> current free-page count is not the mapping length. On an abort with the
> current code it is one page larger, and munmap() may remove an adjacent
> mapping. After the pages are faulted in, a pre-existing hugepage pool can
> instead make it smaller and leave part of p_sync mapped.
Yes, fixed. Added a global sync_mapping_size, set it at mmap() time
and reused it in both run_test() and cleanup(). This avoids using
SAFE_READ_MEMINFO() in cleanup() which can return a different value
than what was actually mapped
>> +		{NULL, NULL, NULL}
> Could this use the standard empty sentinel "{}"? check-hugemmap42 reports
> LTP-005 for this options array.
Yes, fixed. Changed {NULL, NULL, NULL} to {}.
>
> Verdict - Needs revision
>
> ---
> Note:
>
> The agent can sometimes produce false positives although often its
> findings are genuine. If you find issues with the review, please
> comment this email or ignore the suggestions.
>
> Regards,
> LTP AI Reviewer

v7 patch will follow shortly.

Regards,
Samir

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-18 14:31 [LTP] [PATCH v6] hugemmap: Migrate alloc-instantiate-race test from libhugetlbfs Samir Mulani
2026-08-18 20:27 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-08-21 17:01   ` Samir M [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-21 12:12 [LTP] [PATCH v7] " Samir Mulani
2026-08-21 18:39 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f6fff2f-2b56-429d-8b60-c6ea520cf0e4@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=samir@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.