All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Pavel Begunkov' <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] iov_iter: optimise iter type checking
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:28:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f7ba1dbbc4749f09ae44aafc6ada284@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed385c4d-99ca-d7aa-8874-96e3c6b743bb@gmail.com>

From: Pavel Begunkov
> Sent: 27 January 2021 15:48
> 
> On 16/01/2021 05:18, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 10:11:09PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> >
> >>> Does any code actually look at the fields as a pair?
> >>> Would it even be better to use separate bytes?
> >>> Even growing the on-stack structure by a word won't really matter.
> >>
> >> u8 type, rw;
> >>
> >> That won't bloat the struct. I like the idea. If used together compilers
> >> can treat it as u16.
> >
> > Reasonable, and from what I remember from looking through the users,
> > no readers will bother with looking at both at the same time.
> 
> Al, are you going turn it into a patch, or prefer me to take over?

I'd definitely leave the type as a bitmap.

It may be useful to add ITER_IOVEC_SINGLE to optimise some
very common paths for user iovec with only a single buffer.
But you'd probably want to keep the full version for
more unusual (or already expensive) cases.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-27 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-21 14:37 [PATCH] iov_iter: optimise iter type checking Pavel Begunkov
2020-12-06 16:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-09 16:09   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-09 17:03     ` Al Viro
2021-01-09 21:19       ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-09 21:49       ` David Laight
2021-01-09 22:11         ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-11  9:35           ` David Laight
2021-01-12 16:04             ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-16  5:18           ` Al Viro
2021-01-17 12:12             ` David Laight
2021-01-27 15:48             ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-27 16:28               ` David Laight [this message]
2021-01-27 18:30                 ` Al Viro
2021-01-27 18:31               ` Al Viro
2021-01-28 11:39                 ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f7ba1dbbc4749f09ae44aafc6ada284@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.