All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>,
	Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>, Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>,
	Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 05/13] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:31:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <700fc2e5-445d-46c4-bdde-0dd29bcdb2bc@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEsCzLNdRXu25tzhrnTVatM6pHwVXVUn7kE=3erVWQUL4g@mail.gmail.com>

On 1/10/2024 10:08 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:40 AM Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> When device ownership is passed to a new process via VHOST_NEW_OWNER,
>> some devices need to know the new userland addresses of the dma mappings.
>> Define the new iotlb message type VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP to update the uaddr
>> of a mapping.  The new uaddr must address the same memory object as
>> originally mapped.
>>
>> The user must suspend the device before the old address is invalidated,
>> and cannot resume it until after VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP is called, but this
>> requirement is not enforced by the API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c             | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h | 11 ++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> index faed6471934a..ec5ca20bd47d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> @@ -1219,6 +1219,37 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_pa_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>
>>  }
>>
>> +static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_remap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>> +                                         struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
>> +                                         struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> +       struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>> +       const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>> +       u32 asid = iotlb_to_asid(iotlb);
>> +       u64 start = msg->iova;
>> +       u64 last = start + msg->size - 1;
>> +       struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
>> +       int r = 0;
>> +
>> +       if (msg->perm || !msg->size)
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last);
>> +       if (!map)
>> +               return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> +       if (map->start != start || map->last != last)
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       /* batch will finish with remap.  non-batch must do it now. */
>> +       if (!v->in_batch)
>> +               r = ops->set_map(vdpa, asid, iotlb);
>> +       if (!r)
>> +               map->addr = msg->uaddr;
> 
> I may miss something, for example for PA mapping,
> 
> 1) need to convert uaddr into phys addr
> 2) need to check whether the uaddr is backed by the same page or not?

This code does not verify that the new size@uaddr points to the same physical
pages as the old size@uaddr.  If the app screws up and they differ, then the app
may corrupt its own memory, but no-one else's.

It would be expensive for large memories to verify page by page, O(npages), and such
verification lies on the critical path for virtual machine downtime during live update.
I could compare the properties of the vma(s) for the old size@uaddr vs the vma for the 
new, but that is more complicated and would be a maintenance headache.  When I submitted
such code to Alex W when writing the equivalent patches for vfio, he said don't check,
correctness is the user's responsibility.

- Steve

>> +
>> +       return r;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>                                            struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
>>                                            struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)
>> @@ -1298,6 +1329,9 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, u32 asid,
>>                         ops->set_map(vdpa, asid, iotlb);
>>                 v->in_batch = false;
>>                 break;
>> +       case VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP:
>> +               r = vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_remap(v, iotlb, msg);
>> +               break;
>>         default:
>>                 r = -EINVAL;
>>                 break;
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h
>> index 9177843951e9..35908315ff55 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h
>> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct vhost_iotlb_msg {
>>  /*
>>   * VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_BEGIN and VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_END allow modifying
>>   * multiple mappings in one go: beginning with
>> - * VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_BEGIN, followed by any number of
>> + * VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_BEGIN, followed by any number of VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP or
>>   * VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE messages, and ending with VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_END.
>>   * When one of these two values is used as the message type, the rest
>>   * of the fields in the message are ignored. There's no guarantee that
>> @@ -87,6 +87,15 @@ struct vhost_iotlb_msg {
>>   */
>>  #define VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_BEGIN    5
>>  #define VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_END      6
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP registers a new uaddr for the existing mapping at iova.
>> + * The new uaddr must address the same memory object as originally mapped.
>> + * Failure to do so will result in user memory corruption and/or device
>> + * misbehavior.  iova and size must match the arguments used to create the
>> + * an existing mapping.  Protection is not changed, and perm must be 0.
>> + */
>> +#define VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP          7
>>         __u8 type;
>>  };
>>
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-17 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-10 20:40 [RFC V1 00/13] vdpa live update Steve Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 01/13] vhost-vdpa: count pinned memory Steve Sistare
2024-01-10 22:24   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-01-17 20:34     ` Steven Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 02/13] vhost-vdpa: pass mm to bind Steve Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 03/13] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_NEW_OWNER Steve Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 04/13] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_BACKEND_F_NEW_OWNER Steve Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 05/13] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP Steve Sistare
2024-01-11  3:08   ` Jason Wang
2024-01-17 20:31     ` Steven Sistare [this message]
2024-01-22  4:05       ` Jason Wang
2024-01-16 18:14   ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-02-09 15:49     ` Steven Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 06/13] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_REMAP Steve Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 07/13] vhost-vdpa: flush workers on suspend Steve Sistare
2024-01-11  3:09   ` Jason Wang
2024-01-11 16:17     ` Mike Christie
2024-01-12  2:28       ` Jason Wang
2024-01-17 20:30         ` Steven Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 08/13] vduse: " Steve Sistare
2024-01-11  3:09   ` Jason Wang
2024-01-17 20:31     ` Steven Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 09/13] vdpa_sim: reset must not run Steve Sistare
2024-01-16 18:33   ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 10/13] vdpa_sim: flush workers on suspend Steve Sistare
2024-01-16 18:57   ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2024-01-17 20:31     ` Steven Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 11/13] vdpa/mlx5: new owner capability Steve Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 12/13] vdpa_sim: " Steve Sistare
2024-01-10 20:40 ` [RFC V1 13/13] vduse: " Steve Sistare
2024-01-11  2:55 ` [RFC V1 00/13] vdpa live update Jason Wang
2024-01-17 20:31   ` Steven Sistare
2024-01-22  4:12     ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=700fc2e5-445d-46c4-bdde-0dd29bcdb2bc@oracle.com \
    --to=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
    --cc=elic@nvidia.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.