From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED29D0E6C8 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] udev-extraconf: Split automount and autonet into seperate packages To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: "Vivek Puar" X-Originating-Location: Hyderabad, Telangana, IN (163.116.219.94) X-Originating-Platform: Windows Chrome 142 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:13:57 -0800 References: <20251125090722.2240655-1-vpuar@qti.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <702331.1764069237193795417@lists.openembedded.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Lh3Gv9ejHebgYpARU6OQ" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 11:13:59 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/226763 --Lh3Gv9ejHebgYpARU6OQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 04:01 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: >=20 > This still needs an answer to the question asked previously: how was > this patch tested? Given that previous iterations of the patch made > serious runtime dependency omissions, I'm somewhat nervous that the > patch hasn't been actually verified on the target. >=20 > Alex With this latest change, I've verified on the target that it meets all the dependencies when we install packages individually and also verified that all the dependencies are met when udev-extraconf is added to the image. So I've covered all the possibilities and verified on the target. Vivek --Lh3Gv9ejHebgYpARU6OQ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 04:01 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
This still needs an answer to the question asked previously: ho= w was
this patch tested? Given that previous iterations of the patch m= ade
serious runtime dependency omissions, I'm somewhat nervous that th= e
patch hasn't been actually verified on the target.

Alex With this latest change, I've verified on the target that it meets all
the dependencies when we install packages individually and also
verified that all the dependencies are met when udev-extraconf is = ;
added to the image. So I've covered all the possibilities and verified= on
the target.
 
Vivek
--Lh3Gv9ejHebgYpARU6OQ--