From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 15:26:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <704015867.215142.1649078805251.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> In-Reply-To: <49ea6194-c0da-6039-fc96-9686bec23ad1@siemens.com> References: <20220330201614.31083-1-richard@nod.at> <74b8e93cc14b656f6d97bff5d6ef2c2dd606f64b.camel@siemens.com> <637249774.202758.1648715778757.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <589a354736795684073a1b35b5605205e72febec.camel@siemens.com> <49ea6194-c0da-6039-fc96-9686bec23ad1@siemens.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Alchemy: Fix rt_task_unblock() for RT_MUTEX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Florian Bezdeka , xenomai ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Jan Kiszka" > An: "Richard Weinberger" , "Florian Bezdeka= " > CC: "richard" , "xenomai" > Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2022 13:20:55 > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Alchemy: Fix rt_task_unblock() for RT_MUTEX > On 04.04.22 11:39, Richard Weinberger via Xenomai wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 9:16 AM Bezdeka, Florian via Xenomai >> wrote: >>>> With my changes at least the application works again and the tests >>>> on the customer side pass. >>> >>> We would need such / similar tests as well inside the Xenomai testsuite >>> to make sure we don't break it again. >>=20 >> I'm a bit unsure where to place the test. >> Under testsuite/ seems to be not a single alchemy related test. >> Shall I create a new folder? >=20 > There is lib/alchemy/testsuite/ - but also > https://gitlab.com/Xenomai/xenomai-hacker-space/-/issues/32. :-S Thanks for the pointer. I fear there are more TODOs, just gave some tests a try. LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D/usr/xenomai/lib64 lib/alchemy/testsuite/task-5.c.exe=20 [9] at task-5.c:79 [1] at task-5.c:23 [10] at task-5.c:87 [3] at task-5.c:40 [11] at task-5.c:95 [4] at task-5.c:45 [5] at task-5.c:50 [6] at task-5.c:55 [2] at task-5.c:28 [7] at task-5.c:60 0"001.868| BUG in __traceobj_check_abort(): [FGND] wrong return status: task-5.c:63 =3D> EINVAL (want OK) Thanks, //richard