From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Restore context entry setup order for aliased devices
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 14:15:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7055e215-4292-4556-a481-7cd5ffe117fe@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1826e96b-15bd-472d-b535-c72b58e06561@intel.com>
On 5/16/2025 2:11 PM, Yi Liu wrote:
>
> On 2025/5/14 14:05, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Commit 2031c469f816 ("iommu/vt-d: Add support for static identity
>> domain")
>> changed the context entry setup during domain attachment from a
>> set-and-check policy to a clear-and-reset approach. This inadvertently
>> introduced a regression affecting PCI aliased devices behind PCIe-to-PCI
>> bridges.
>
> I got what the patch does. But just bit confused on the above description.
> I didn't see the commit 2031c469f816 mentioned any policy thing on the
> context entry setup. To me, the problem looks to be that the info->domain
> is no more accurate to be used for checking if any domain is attached after
> the above commit. Maybe I missed something. feel free correct me.
The problem was introduced by below change:
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -3691,11 +3691,9 @@ int prepare_domain_attach_device(struct
iommu_domain *domain,
static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev)
{
- struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
int ret;
- if (info->domain)
- device_block_translation(dev);
+ device_block_translation(dev);
And after the introduction of static identity domain, "info->domain ==
NULL" doesn't mean no domain attaching to device anymore. So this patch
uses a specific flag bit to indicate this.
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-14 6:05 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Restore context entry setup order for aliased devices Lu Baolu
2025-05-15 8:28 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-05-16 6:11 ` Yi Liu
2025-05-16 6:15 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-20 7:58 [PATCH 0/1][PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v6.16-rc1 Lu Baolu
2025-05-20 7:58 ` [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Restore context entry setup order for aliased devices Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7055e215-4292-4556-a481-7cd5ffe117fe@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gargaditya08@live.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kobarity@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.