From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net] r8169: work around RTL8125 UDP hw bug
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:17:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <705c618b-1e24-97f8-e223-ee933a31de41@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-+n6RGCTnWXf4Tjq8pvKTdWmr8xdHHbYX5JPSmTHOi1ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 28.01.2021 19:36, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:44 AM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It was reported that on RTL8125 network breaks under heavy UDP load,
>> e.g. torrent traffic ([0], from comment 27). Realtek confirmed a hw bug
>> and provided me with a test version of the r8125 driver including a
>> workaround. Tests confirmed that the workaround fixes the issue.
>> I modified the original version of the workaround to meet mainline
>> code style.
>>
>> [0] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209839
>>
>> v2:
>> - rebased to net
>> v3:
>> - make rtl_skb_is_udp() more robust and use skb_header_pointer()
>> to access the ip(v6) header
>>
>> Fixes: f1bce4ad2f1c ("r8169: add support for RTL8125")
>> Tested-by: xplo <xplo.bn@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> index a569abe7f..457fa1404 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> #include <linux/prefetch.h>
>> #include <linux/ipv6.h>
>> +#include <linux/ptp_classify.h>
>
> this is only for UDP_HLEN? perhaps use sizeof(struct udphdr) instead
> to remove the dependency.
>
It's also for PTP_EV_PORT. But yes, we can define this locally to
remove the dependency.
>> #include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
>>
>> #include "r8169.h"
>> @@ -4046,17 +4047,70 @@ static int rtl8169_xmit_frags(struct rtl8169_private *tp, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> return -EIO;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool rtl_test_hw_pad_bug(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>> +static bool rtl_skb_is_udp(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> + int no = skb_network_offset(skb);
>> + struct ipv6hdr *i6h, _i6h;
>> + struct iphdr *ih, _ih;
>> +
>> + switch (vlan_get_protocol(skb)) {
>> + case htons(ETH_P_IP):
>> + ih = skb_header_pointer(skb, no, sizeof(_ih), &_ih);
>> + return ih && ih->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP;
>> + case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
>> + i6h = skb_header_pointer(skb, no, sizeof(_i6h), &_i6h);
>> + return i6h && i6h->nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP;
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define RTL_MIN_PATCH_LEN 47
>> +#define PTP_GEN_PORT 320
>> +
>> +/* see rtl8125_get_patch_pad_len() in r8125 vendor driver */
>> +static unsigned int rtl8125_quirk_udp_padto(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
>> + struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int padto = 0, len = skb->len;
>> +
>> + if (rtl_is_8125(tp) && len < 128 + RTL_MIN_PATCH_LEN &&
>> + rtl_skb_is_udp(skb) && skb_transport_header_was_set(skb)) {
>> + unsigned int trans_data_len = skb_tail_pointer(skb) -
>> + skb_transport_header(skb);
>> +
>> + if (trans_data_len > 3 && trans_data_len < RTL_MIN_PATCH_LEN) {
>
> trans_data_len > 3
>
> here probably means
>
> trans_data_len >= offsetof(struct udphdr, len)
>
offsetof(struct udphdr, len) = 5
Presumably the check ensures that udphdr->dest is accessible. I think we should
use skb_header_pointer() here too.
> to safely access dest. Then that is a bit more self documenting
>
>> + u16 dest = ntohs(udp_hdr(skb)->dest);
>> +
>> + if (dest == PTP_EV_PORT || dest == PTP_GEN_PORT)
>> + padto = len + RTL_MIN_PATCH_LEN - trans_data_len;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (trans_data_len < UDP_HLEN)
>
> nit: else if ?
>
I don't think so. If e.g. trans_data_len == 5 and dest port isn't a PTP port,
then the trans_data_len < UDP_HLEN branch wouldn't be execeuted.
>> + padto = max(padto, len + UDP_HLEN - trans_data_len);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return padto;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int rtl_quirk_packet_padto(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
>> + struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int padto;
>> +
>> + padto = rtl8125_quirk_udp_padto(tp, skb);
>> +
>> switch (tp->mac_version) {
>> case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_34:
>> case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_60:
>> case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_61:
>> case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_63:
>> - return true;
>> + padto = max_t(unsigned int, padto, ETH_ZLEN);
>> default:
>> - return false;
>> + break;
>> }
>> +
>> + return padto;
>> }
>>
>> static void rtl8169_tso_csum_v1(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *opts)
>> @@ -4128,9 +4182,10 @@ static bool rtl8169_tso_csum_v2(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
>>
>> opts[1] |= transport_offset << TCPHO_SHIFT;
>> } else {
>> - if (unlikely(skb->len < ETH_ZLEN && rtl_test_hw_pad_bug(tp)))
>> - /* eth_skb_pad would free the skb on error */
>> - return !__skb_put_padto(skb, ETH_ZLEN, false);
>> + unsigned int padto = rtl_quirk_packet_padto(tp, skb);
>> +
>> + /* skb_padto would free the skb on error */
>> + return !__skb_put_padto(skb, padto, false);
>
> should this path still pad to ETH_ZLEN as a minimum when the other
> cases do not hit?
>
For most chip versions that's not needed because hw does the padding
to ETH_ZLEN. Few chip versions have a hw bug and padding needs to be
done in sw, that's handled in rtl_quirk_packet_padto().
>> }
>>
>> return true;
>> @@ -4307,6 +4362,9 @@ static netdev_features_t rtl8169_features_check(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> if (skb->len < ETH_ZLEN)
>> features &= ~NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK;
>>
>> + if (rtl_quirk_packet_padto(tp, skb))
>> + features &= ~NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK;
>> +
>> if (transport_offset > TCPHO_MAX &&
>> rtl_chip_supports_csum_v2(tp))
>> features &= ~NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK;
>> --
>> 2.30.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 7:44 [PATCH v3 net] r8169: work around RTL8125 UDP hw bug Heiner Kallweit
2021-01-28 18:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-01-28 20:17 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2021-01-28 20:27 ` Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=705c618b-1e24-97f8-e223-ee933a31de41@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.