From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,a53pll: drop operating-points-v2
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:11:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <705c78c1d0da18089419b064832d5fed.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063c5516-417d-7c21-b58f-a6552779a621@linaro.org>
Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2023-01-15 06:35:23)
> On 13/01/2023 21:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2023-01-13 06:58:59)
> >> The CPU PLL clock node does not use OPP tables (neither driver).
> >
> > What device is qcom_a53pll_get_freq_tbl() operating on?
>
> On its own, internal table. While of course driver could be converted to
> operating-points-v2, no one did it within last 5 years, so why it should
> happen now?
>
The property was added mid 2021 by Shawn[1], that's not 5 years ago. I
guess there were plans to add an OPP table that never happened[2]? Is
Shawn still working on this? If not, we should revert the OPP code out
of the driver.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210704024032.11559-4-shawn.guo@linaro.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210709021334.GB11342@dragon/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-13 14:58 [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,a53pll: drop operating-points-v2 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-13 20:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-01-15 14:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-18 19:11 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2023-01-19 3:11 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-01-19 10:55 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-01-19 11:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-19 11:33 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-01-17 18:34 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=705c78c1d0da18089419b064832d5fed.sboyd@kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.