From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: pppoe: implement GRO/GSO support
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:00:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <706bb6df-7cf9-41d1-8041-4248252404dd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811095734.71019-1-nbd@nbd.name>
On 8/11/25 11:57 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> @@ -1173,6 +1174,161 @@ static struct pernet_operations pppoe_net_ops = {
> .size = sizeof(struct pppoe_net),
> };
>
> +static u16
> +compare_pppoe_header(struct pppoe_hdr *phdr, struct pppoe_hdr *phdr2)
> +{
> + return (__force __u16)((phdr->sid ^ phdr2->sid) |
> + (phdr->tag[0].tag_type ^ phdr2->tag[0].tag_type));
I'm sorry for the late feedback.
I see that the pppoe rcv() code ignores the type and ver fields, but I
guess it should be better to match them here, to ensure that the
segmented packet sequence matches the pre-aggregation one.
You could cast the phdr* to u32* and compare such integer.
> +}
> +
> +static __be16 pppoe_hdr_proto(struct pppoe_hdr *phdr)
> +{
> + switch (phdr->tag[0].tag_type) {
> + case cpu_to_be16(PPP_IP):
> + return cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_IP);
> + case cpu_to_be16(PPP_IPV6):
> + return cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_IPV6);
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
Minor nit: unneeded empty line above
> +}
> +
> +static struct sk_buff *pppoe_gro_receive(struct list_head *head,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + const struct packet_offload *ptype;
> + unsigned int hlen, off_pppoe;
> + struct sk_buff *pp = NULL;
> + struct pppoe_hdr *phdr;
> + struct sk_buff *p;
> + int flush = 1;
> + __be16 type;
> +
> + off_pppoe = skb_gro_offset(skb);
> + hlen = off_pppoe + sizeof(*phdr);
> + phdr = skb_gro_header(skb, hlen + 2, off_pppoe);
> + if (unlikely(!phdr))
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* ignore packets with padding or invalid length */
> + if (skb_gro_len(skb) != be16_to_cpu(phdr->length) + hlen)
> + goto out;
What about filtering for phdr->code == 0 (session data) to avoid useless
late processing?
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 9:57 [PATCH net-next v3] net: pppoe: implement GRO/GSO support Felix Fietkau
2025-08-14 9:00 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-08-14 14:30 ` Richard Gobert
2025-08-15 17:24 ` Felix Fietkau
2025-08-18 11:22 ` Richard Gobert
2025-08-18 13:32 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=706bb6df-7cf9-41d1-8041-4248252404dd@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mostrows@earthlink.net \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.