From: Pankaj Raghav <pankaj.raghav@linux.dev>
To: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, dgc@kernel.org
Cc: bfoster@redhat.com, lukas@herbolt.com,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
gost.dev@samsung.com, andres@anarazel.de,
kundan.kumar@samsung.com, hch@lst.de, cem@kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, pankaj.raghav@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] xfs: add support for FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 12:20:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7084832c-800b-4248-aaee-3da5ea266c1f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604101442.2613872-3-p.raghav@samsung.com>
> +
> + error = xfs_alloc_file_space(ip, offset, len,
> + XFS_ALLOC_FILE_SPACE_WRITE_ZEROES);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + /*
> + * xfs_falloc_setsize() would re-zero the written extents via
> + * iomap_zero_range(). Use xfs_setfilesize() instead.
> + * Update in-core i_size first as xfs_setfilesize() clamps the on-disk
> + * size to it.
> + */
> + if (new_size > i_size_read(inode))
> + i_size_write(inode, new_size);
> +
> + return xfs_setfilesize(ip, offset, len);
Sashiko reported:
On 32-bit systems where size_t is 32 bits, lengths exceeding 4GB will be
truncated, which might cause the on-disk inode size to be permanently updated
to a severely incorrect smaller size.
So a simple fix would be the following as we already store the value of offset + len locally:
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 37623baaaed6..86fae2190c24 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -1426,7 +1426,7 @@ xfs_falloc_write_zeroes(
if (new_size > i_size_read(inode))
i_size_write(inode, new_size);
- return xfs_setfilesize(ip, offset, len);
+ return xfs_setfilesize(ip, new_size, 0);
}
Probably I will update setfilesize to take 64bit values for len in a separate series.
I will also wait if others have any comments before sending the next version.
@Dave: You were against the initial design[1]. Let me know your thoughts on the current version.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/abCzhDSVmFx4PtWI@dread/
--
Pankaj
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 10:14 [PATCH v5 0/2] add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES support to xfs Pankaj Raghav
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] xfs: add an allocation mode to xfs_alloc_file_space() Pankaj Raghav
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] xfs: add support for FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES Pankaj Raghav
2026-06-08 10:20 ` Pankaj Raghav [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7084832c-800b-4248-aaee-3da5ea266c1f@linux.dev \
--to=pankaj.raghav@linux.dev \
--cc=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kundan.kumar@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@herbolt.com \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.