From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B62C43461 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69BAC22206 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="nQvXgsjH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 69BAC22206 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1C641766; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:41:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz F1C641766 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1599576164; bh=IaEDgcjtEiJfjlVSUOawyZq3uPmeo6HyiX7JB1yeUYs=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=nQvXgsjH2JJF81ddul9I/qy71R6XaU/Ut5aCTahP+SoJ/oUf4S6eOwJrcCsQutQ7w Xv+TLnjokO8FZct7EsPmpWzLIsqtxefXXTN58nW2eveVTp9b4z41WFpPrSskw7QUCv OqE2B35udMwL89KfM7uTDX3Bdm9VqBwxxJhfab1M= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72095F8010B; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:41:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id E9F9DF80264; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:41:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C18F8010B for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:41:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 83C18F8010B IronPort-SDR: q5NBwhKZHuKmgKrViqCq08xq3fOQd9mVJVpfcvj7Nlc8W96khhCfWJxT9/AH4DgoFzpIN/w1rR BVOhJWoJ1jPQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9738"; a="155542346" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,406,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="155542346" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Sep 2020 07:41:41 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 4I5NhY7+9JXI6nAXoUat6O53GXCOJPCYaQDi/HaLR6AlaamRMFHnn0yCJVFVVDwBWQVGoJofix SxeDT1u3n0IA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,406,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="448809442" Received: from mgarber-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.179.134]) ([10.212.179.134]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Sep 2020 07:41:36 -0700 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] topology: use inclusive language for bclk To: Mark Brown References: <20200903201024.1109914-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20200903201024.1109914-2-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20200908143504.GD5551@sirena.org.uk> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Message-ID: <70a2012f-aa8b-52db-7694-592677d7171c@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 09:41:34 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200908143504.GD5551@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On 9/8/20 9:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:39:13AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > >>>> - __u8 bclk_master; /* SND_SOC_TPLG_BCLK_ value */ >>>> + __u8 bclk_provider; /* SND_SOC_TPLG_BCLK_ value */ > >>> Is it 100% compatible? Note that the uapi/* header is a copy from the >>> kernel header, and it means that we'll change the same for the kernel, >>> too. > >> It's absolutely 100% compatible by design. >> I was planning to update the kernel uapi header to align changes, but the >> volume of code is much lower on the alsa-lib side. Will resubmit with the >> preferred provider/consumer wording. > > It's binary compatible but it'd break the build for any existing code > using the UAPI headers. Sorry, I don't fully get the comment. Aren't the uapi headers copied into each software tree that relies on them?