From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [bpf] Observing Kernel Softlock up while running BPF self tests
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 22:31:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70cd2d0d-334f-4f08-b568-419d40ebe470@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6926384-0b4e-44e2-a828-1ddb57500b3b@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Venkat,
Thanks for reporting..
On 20/01/26 2:40 pm, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote:
> Greetings!!!
>
>
> IBM CI has reported a kernel softlockup, while running BPF selftests on
> PowerPC kernel.
>
>
> Traces:
>
> [ 1632.509843] audit: type=1334 audit(1769127975.721:164430): prog-
> id=82135 op=LOAD
> [ 1632.509852] audit: type=1334 audit(1769127975.721:164431): prog-
> id=82135 op=UNLOAD
> [ 1637.016921] Mode = AA
> [ 1660.780274] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#8 stuck for 23s!
> [rqsl_w/8:51609]
> [ 1660.780283] Modules linked in: bpf_test_rqspinlock(OE+) 8021q(E)
> garp(E) mrp(E) stp(E) llc(E) vrf(E) tun(E) bpf_testmod(OE) veth(E)
> nft_fib_inet(E) nft_fib_ipv4(E) nft_fib_ipv6(E) nft_fib(E)
> nft_reject_inet(E) nf_reject_ipv4(E) nf_reject_ipv6(E) nft_reject(E)
> bonding(E) nft_ct(E) tls(E) nft_chain_nat(E) rfkill(E) sunrpc(E)
> ibmveth(E) hvcs(E) hvcserver(E) pseries_rng(E) vmx_crypto(E)
> dm_multipath(E) fuse(E) dm_mod(E) drm(E) drm_panel_orientation_quirks(E)
> zram(E) ext4(E) crc16(E) mbcache(E) jbd2(E) sr_mod(E) sd_mod(E) cdrom(E)
> ibmvscsi(E) scsi_transport_srp(E) [last unloaded: livepatch_sample(EK)]
> [ 1660.780352] CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 51609 Comm: rqsl_w/8 Tainted: G OE
> K 6.19.0-rc4-g960c1fd29055 #1 VOLUNTARY
> [ 1660.780359] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE, [K]=LIVEPATCH
> [ 1660.780362] Hardware name: IBM,8375-42A POWER9 (architected) 0x4e0202
> 0xf000005 of:IBM,FW950.80 (VL950_131) hv:phyp pSeries
> [ 1660.780365] NIP: c0000000000399a8 LR: c000000000039c24 CTR:
> c000000000039ca0
> [ 1660.780368] REGS: c000000bc19cfd28 TRAP: 0900 Tainted: G OE K
> (6.19.0-rc4-g960c1fd29055)
> [ 1660.780372] MSR: 800000000280b033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>
> CR: 28000288 XER: 0000000a
> [ 1660.780386] CFAR: 0000000000000000 IRQMASK: 0
> [ 1660.780386] GPR00: c000000000039c24 c000000bc19cfd00 c000000001f58100
> c000000bc19cfcf8
> [ 1660.780386] GPR04: c000000bc19cfea8 0000000000000000 4000000000000002
> c0000013ff916e08
> [ 1660.780386] GPR08: 00000013fd6c0000 0000000000000049 fffffffffffffffc
> c0080000f73e0f98
> [ 1660.780386] GPR12: c000000000039ca0 c00000002e9b6700 c000000000270808
> c000000bad8fe980
> [ 1660.780386] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> 0000000000000000
> [ 1660.780386] GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> 0000000000000000
> [ 1660.780386] GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0080000f7360048
> 0000000000000000
> [ 1660.780386] GPR28: 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 000001827223b155
> 0000000000000003
> [ 1660.780433] NIP [c0000000000399a8] __replay_soft_interrupts+0x38/0x150
> [ 1660.780443] LR [c000000000039c24]
> arch_local_irq_restore.part.0+0xe4/0x160
> [ 1660.780449] Call Trace:
> [ 1660.780452] [c000000bc19cfd00] [c000000000039a0c]
> __replay_soft_interrupts+0x9c/0x150 (unreliable)
> [ 1660.780460] [c000000bc19cfeb0] [c000000000039c24]
> arch_local_irq_restore.part.0+0xe4/0x160
> [ 1660.780468] [c000000bc19cfef0] [c0080000f73e042c]
> rqspinlock_worker_fn+0x244/0x300 [bpf_test_rqspinlock]
> [ 1660.780476] [c000000bc19cff90] [c000000000270954] kthread+0x154/0x170
> [ 1660.780482] [c000000bc19cffe0] [c00000000000df78]
> start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18
> [ 1660.780487] Code: 60000000 7c0802a6 f8010010 f821fe51 e92d0c78
> f92101a8 39200000 38610028 892d0933 61290040 992d0933 48102e15
> <60000000> 39200000 e9410130 f9210160
>
Does the system recover after this or is it unresponsive?
- Hari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-22 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 9:10 [bpf] Observing Kernel Softlock up while running BPF self tests Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-01-22 17:01 ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2026-01-29 19:47 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70cd2d0d-334f-4f08-b568-419d40ebe470@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.