On 8/22/2022 15:15, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> On 8/22/22 2:03 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
>> =========================================================================================
>> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/group/test/atomic_test/ucode:
>>    lkp-skl-d01/kernel-selftests/debian-12-x86_64-20220629.cgz/x86_64-rhel-8.3-kselftests/gcc-11/net/fcnal-test.sh/use_cases/0xf0
>>
>> commit:
>>    cae90bd22cffb ("net: bridge: vlan: fix error return code in __vlan_add()")
>>    2ef23e860e765 ("vrf: packets with lladdr src needs dst at input with orig_iif when needs strict")
>>
>> cae90bd22cffb1e1 2ef23e860e765eb1dd287492206
>> ---------------- ---------------------------
>>         fail:runs  %reproduction    fail:runs
>>             |             |             |
>>             :6          100%           6:6     kernel-selftests.net.fcnal-test.sh.fail
>>
>>
>> FYI, we noticed that this is a backport commit of upstream 205704c618af0ab2366015d2281a3b0814d918a0
>> (merged by v5.10), so we also test this case on mainline, and this issue doesn't exist.
> 
> Can you test the latest linux-5.4.y branch and see whether the issue
> exists on there?
> 
> You can pull from:
> 
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git linux-5.4.y
> 
> The HEAD commit is:
> 
>     de0cd3ea700d1e8ed76705d02e33b524cbb84cf3 ("Linux 5.4.210")
> 

The issue doesn't exist on latest head of linux-5.4.y branch

=========================================================================================
atomic_test/compiler/group/kconfig/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode:
   use_cases/gcc-11/net/x86_64-rhel-8.3-kselftests/debian-12-x86_64-20220629.cgz/lkp-skl-d01/fcnal-test.sh/kernel-selftests/0xf0

commit:
   2ef23e860e765 ("vrf: packets with lladdr src needs dst at input with orig_iif when needs strict")
   cae90bd22cffb ("net: bridge: vlan: fix error return code in __vlan_add()")
   de0cd3ea700d1 ("Linux 5.4.210")

2ef23e860e765eb1 cae90bd22cffb1e19a83a794ad5                    v5.4.210
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
        fail:runs  %reproduction    fail:runs  %reproduction    fail:runs
            |             |             |             |             |
            :6          100%           6:6            0%            :2     kernel-selftests.net.fcnal-test.sh.pass


Do you suggest that if we find any issue on the branches like "for-5.*-lts", we could also
run a test on corresponding stable branch? We will consider this step in the future.

--
Thanks,
Yujie