From: Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
mingo@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, isaacm@codeaurora.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpu stopper threads and setaffinity leads to deadlock
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:57:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <712493a7926b0f58543be052ced95db9@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1808031340500.1745@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On 2018-08-03 04:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Prasad.
>
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> So why didn't you do the 'obvious' parallel to what you did for
>> cpu_stop_queue_two_works(), namely:
>
> Is that patch fixing the issue for you?
<Prasad> Hi Thomas and Peter,
Yes. Tested both versions of patches and both variants are working on
Qualcomm devices
with stress testing of set affinity and tasks cross-migration, which
were previously leading to the deadlock.
-Thanks, Prasad
>
>> --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
>> +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static bool cpu_stop_queue_work(unsigned
>> unsigned long flags;
>> bool enabled;
>>
>> + preempt_disable();
>> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&stopper->lock, flags);
>> enabled = stopper->enabled;
>> if (enabled)
>> @@ -90,6 +91,7 @@ static bool cpu_stop_queue_work(unsigned
>> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stopper->lock, flags);
>>
>> wake_up_q(&wakeq);
>> + preempt_enable();
>>
>> return enabled;
>> }
>>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-03 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-02 1:34 cpu stopper threads and setaffinity leads to deadlock Sodagudi Prasad
2018-08-02 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-02 8:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-02 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-02 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-03 11:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-08-03 18:57 ` Sodagudi Prasad [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=712493a7926b0f58543be052ced95db9@codeaurora.org \
--to=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=isaacm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.