From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>,
"yanjun.zhu@linux.dev" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: reject non-8-byte ATOMIC_WRITE payloads
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 20:34:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7176fdf5-55ed-4e95-ba15-52286975eccb@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJJ9bXxd5jzzGcsf-sTw-v2zk-9Q0AtDrNwXRtyh-m5O9tr-6Q@mail.gmail.com>
在 2026/4/18 18:57, Michael Bommarito 写道:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 7:18 PM Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev> wrote:
>> The fix should stand on its own, and the test case can be added as a
>> follow-up patch under tools/testing/selftests/rdma (or rdma-core if more appropriate).
>> This keeps each patch focused on a single logical change and makes review easier.
> It seems like mainlining rdma tests might not be a good idea. I found
> the last time here:
> Kamal Heib, 23 Oct 2019 — [PATCH for-next] selftests: rdma: Add rdma tests
>
> I put the tests here and will PR it into linux-rdma/rdma-core tomorrow:
> https://github.com/mjbommar/rdma-core/blob/4104d991a764de4aad9f645a2f0ec723f6076209/tests/test_rxe_atomic_write_oob.py
Thanks a lot. I am fine with the above link.
Zhu Yanjun
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Bommarito
--
Best Regards,
Yanjun.Zhu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-19 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-18 16:21 [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: reject non-8-byte ATOMIC_WRITE payloads Michael Bommarito
2026-04-18 22:49 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-04-18 23:11 ` Michael Bommarito
[not found] ` <1bd36ce7-e3dd-4ff5-867a-b8b9ade90a1e@linux.dev>
2026-04-19 1:57 ` Michael Bommarito
2026-04-19 3:34 ` Zhu Yanjun [this message]
2026-04-28 14:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7176fdf5-55ed-4e95-ba15-52286975eccb@linux.dev \
--to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--cc=yangx.jy@fujitsu.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.