From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: Daniel Elstner <daniel.elstner@gmx.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reiserfs+lndir problem [was: 2.4.4 SMP: spurious EOVERFLOW "Value too large for defined data type"]
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 18:48:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71770000.988757331@tiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010502004152.23a0751b.daniel@master.daniel.homenet>
On Wednesday, May 02, 2001 12:41:52 AM +0200 Daniel Elstner
<daniel.elstner@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:03:47 -0400 Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> > Apparently it's a reiserfs/symlink problem.
>> > I tried doing the lndir on an ext2 partition, sources still
>> > on reiserfs. And it worked just fine!
>>
>> Neat, thanks for the extra details. Does that mean you can consistently
>> repeat on reiserfs now? What happens when you do the lndir on reiserfs
>> and diff the directories?
>
> I just played around a bit with the following results:
>
> sources on reiserfs, lndir on reiserfs -> make fails, diff ok
> sources on reiserfs, lndir on ext2 -> make ok
> sources on ext2, lndir on reiserfs -> make fails, diff ok
>
> Doing the diff against a second copy of the tree shows no errors, too.
> Always the same behaviour: You have to run lndir at least twice to
> get the error. If the link tree was already set up after a boot, the
> error occurs only after rm + lndir + rm + lndir.
>
> There's a strange way to get things working just like after a reboot.
> After diff'ing the link tree with the 2nd copy (both on reiserfs),
> make World won't fail - at least once.
Ok, can you reproduce with a set of sources other than X? I would leave
glibc alone for now, unless you can reproduce on ext2.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-01 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-30 18:56 2.4.4 SMP: spurious EOVERFLOW "Value too large for defined data type" Daniel Elstner
2001-04-30 20:09 ` Daniel Elstner
2001-04-30 20:55 ` reiserfs+lndir problem [was: 2.4.4 SMP: spurious EOVERFLOW "Value too large for defined data type"] Daniel Elstner
2001-05-01 1:03 ` Chris Mason
2001-05-01 22:41 ` Daniel Elstner
2001-05-01 22:48 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2001-05-02 20:41 ` Daniel Elstner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71770000.988757331@tiny \
--to=mason@suse.com \
--cc=daniel.elstner@gmx.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.