From: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>,
Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>, Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>,
James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>,
Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/2] flow_dissector: do not dissect PPPoE PFC frames
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 11:56:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <717da5ac-a020-4710-8ebb-6ed9d6e48bf4@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410171056.GD469338@kernel.org>
Hi,
On 4/11/2026 1:10 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 11:36:20AM +0800, Qingfang Deng wrote:
>> @@ -1361,7 +1376,7 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net,
>> struct pppoe_hdr hdr;
>> __be16 proto;
>> } *hdr, _hdr;
>> - u16 ppp_proto;
>> + __be16 ppp_proto;
>
> I'm unclear of the relationship between changing the type of ppp_proto
> and the problem described in the patch description. And it
> is creating a log of churn in this patch. I suggest dropping it.
The intention is to restore the original behavior before the blamed
commit. If you find it too verbose for a fix, I can drop it and then
repost that part later to net-next.
>> @@ -1374,27 +1389,19 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net,
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - /* least significant bit of the most significant octet
>> - * indicates if protocol field was compressed
>> - */
>> - ppp_proto = ntohs(hdr->proto);
>> - if (ppp_proto & 0x0100) {
>> - ppp_proto = ppp_proto >> 8;
>> - nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN - 1;
>> - } else {
>> - nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
>> - }
>
> Could we go for something like this?
>
> ppp_proto = ntohs(hdr->proto);
> nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
>
> /* Explanation of what is going on */
> if (ppp_proto & 0x0100)
> ppp_proto = some invalid value like 0
>
I think it is redundant. ppp_proto_is_valid() already requires
uncompressed frames.
>> + ppp_proto = hdr->proto;
>> + nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
>>
>> - if (ppp_proto == PPP_IP) {
>> + if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_IP)) {
>> proto = htons(ETH_P_IP);
>> fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
>> - } else if (ppp_proto == PPP_IPV6) {
>> + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_IPV6)) {
>> proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>> fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
>> - } else if (ppp_proto == PPP_MPLS_UC) {
>> + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_MPLS_UC)) {
>> proto = htons(ETH_P_MPLS_UC);
>> fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
>> - } else if (ppp_proto == PPP_MPLS_MC) {
>> + } else if (ppp_proto == htons(PPP_MPLS_MC)) {
>> proto = htons(ETH_P_MPLS_MC);
>> fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
>> } else if (ppp_proto_is_valid(ppp_proto)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-11 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 3:36 [PATCH net v4 1/2] flow_dissector: do not dissect PPPoE PFC frames Qingfang Deng
2026-04-10 3:36 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] pppoe: drop " Qingfang Deng
2026-04-10 17:11 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-10 17:10 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] flow_dissector: do not dissect PPPoE " Simon Horman
2026-04-11 3:56 ` Qingfang Deng [this message]
2026-04-14 15:50 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=717da5ac-a020-4710-8ebb-6ed9d6e48bf4@linux.dev \
--to=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=carlsonj@workingcode.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaco@uls.co.za \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.