From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jitendra.bhivare@broadcom.com (Jitendra Bhivare)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:17:35 +0530
Subject: Read request exceeding max_hw_sectors_kb
In-Reply-To: <20180614145447.GB8129@localhost.localdomain>
References: <0ba3cccb9d2ee7cba50a91bfc92b373a@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180614145447.GB8129@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <719bd24e00a4f9ed70b9d17472febf24@mail.gmail.com>

> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h index
> bca3a92eb55f..9c57b49a4132 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -1118,8 +1118,8 @@ static inline unsigned int
blk_max_size_offset(struct
> request_queue *q,
>  	if (!q->limits.chunk_sectors)
>  		return q->limits.max_sectors;
>
> -	return q->limits.chunk_sectors -
> -			(offset & (q->limits.chunk_sectors - 1));
> +	return min(q->limits.max_sectors, (unsigned
int)(q->limits.chunk_sectors
> -
> +			(offset & (q->limits.chunk_sectors - 1))));
>  }
>
>  static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_sectors(struct request *rq,
> --

Sorry for the delayed response. This patch works fine too. Please submit
it.

Regards,

JB

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2283728863336592067=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jitendra Bhivare <jitendra.bhivare at broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [SPDK] Read request exceeding max_hw_sectors_kb
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:17:35 +0530
Message-ID: <719bd24e00a4f9ed70b9d17472febf24@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 20180614145447.GB8129@localhost.localdomain
List-ID: <spdk@lists.01.org>
To: spdk@lists.01.org

--===============2283728863336592067==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h index
> bca3a92eb55f..9c57b49a4132 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -1118,8 +1118,8 @@ static inline unsigned int
blk_max_size_offset(struct
> request_queue *q,
>  	if (!q->limits.chunk_sectors)
>  		return q->limits.max_sectors;
>
> -	return q->limits.chunk_sectors -
> -			(offset & (q->limits.chunk_sectors - 1));
> +	return min(q->limits.max_sectors, (unsigned
int)(q->limits.chunk_sectors
> -
> +			(offset & (q->limits.chunk_sectors - 1))));
>  }
>
>  static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_sectors(struct request *rq,
> --

Sorry for the delayed response. This patch works fine too. Please submit
it.

Regards,

JB

--===============2283728863336592067==--