From: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
To: "Kylo Ginsberg" <kylo@kylo.net>
Cc: inuxppc-embedded List <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Recommended kernel version/tree for use with MPC8555E?
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 18:34:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <720b2b390f49b33d5457acde69c745a2@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <422E3CCD.4020204@kylo.net>
Kylo,
All active development for PPC (including the MPCE8555E) is being done=20=
in 2.6 only at this point. I would recommend using 2.6.11 as a=20
starting point. Any code to support new features of the MPC8555E will=20=
be developed for 2.6 at this point.
The 2.6.11 tree has support for both the MPC8560 ADS board=20
(mpc8560_ads_defconfig) and the MPC8555 CDS board=20
(mpc8555_cds_defconfig). Those should be good starting points for any=20=
work you are doing.
- kumar
On Mar 8, 2005, at 6:01 PM, Kylo Ginsberg wrote:
> I've just started working on s/w for an 8555E-based board.=A0 On the=20=
> 8555E
> I will be using the TSECs (Gigabit ethernet interfaces), DMA engines,
> the security engine, UARTs, DDR and Local Bus controllers and that's
> about it.
>
> Right now I've got an MPC8560ADS eval board to test against.=A0 This=20=
> board
> came with a 2.4.26-based kernel; it boots ok and runs the basic apps
> fine, however I haven't yet had an opportunity to exercise the wide
> array of functionality on the chip, so I don't know what gotchas or
> porting difficulties I might meet ahead.
>
> Based on that, what kernel version/tree would you recommend?=A0 Should =
I
> stick with what I've got, move to a ppc-specific 2.4 tree, or jump to
> 2.6.x?=A0 Are there performance/features vs. stability tradeoffs I =
should
> be warned of?
>
> Thanks in advance for any thoughts you may have.
>
> Kylo
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-09 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-09 0:01 Recommended kernel version/tree for use with MPC8555E? Kylo Ginsberg
2005-03-09 0:34 ` Kumar Gala [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=720b2b390f49b33d5457acde69c745a2@freescale.com \
--to=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=kylo@kylo.net \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.