From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Lembark Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] Fun little horror story -- please add to FAQ if it isn't already documented Message-Id: <72110000.1009682972@dizzy> In-Reply-To: <000001c19122$46771750$0b00a8c0@michaelmouse> References: <000001c19122$46771750$0b00a8c0@michaelmouse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Dec 30 09:29:02 2001 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com -- Ben Holness >> Upon the next reboot, the initrd ran fine... found and activated the >> lv's... but the kernel said "no root partition" and hung. I could >> rescue boot the system from the SuSE CD -- everything was there... I >> finally added a "vgdisplay -v" to the initrd's linuxrc, and >> that showed me the problem. We can add it under the general heading of why using LVM for boot volumes doesn't work on i386 platforms. Giving /usr its own mount point genrally levaes the root voume small, static and perfectly happy on a small partition at the top of your disk. Using a static link for LVM and installing it in the root leaves the whole setup quite a bit more dependable. -- Steven Lembark 2930 W. Palmer Workhorse Computing Chicago, IL 60647 +1 800 762 1582