From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] lib/igt_device_scan: add filer card=all
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:14:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7220fa85-ade4-2e9a-abb2-2df6dc2387cf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y0/i3Nfzj31QA/Y8@kamilkon-desk1>
On 19/10/2022 12:43, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi Tvrtko,
>
> On 2022-10-18 at 17:06:29 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 18/10/2022 10:09, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
>>> Allow to select all (up to 16) discrete cards with the help of
>>> card=all or card=*, for example:
>>>
>>> ./gem_basic --device=pci:vendor=intel,device=discrete,card=all
>>
>> What should this do btw? Run the tests on more than one card in sequence?
>> Isn't that test runner's job?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tvrtko
>
> The purpose it to run test in parallel with the help of new fork
> helper or with threads. See my RFC patchset (using fork)
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/109487/
> Add multi-process subtests for multi-GPUs
Those would be running completely independently - I mean no interaction
between the GPUs like work handover, buffer sharing and that? If so my
gut feeling is that the direction needs to be carefully considered. Test
runner could do that just as well for probably much less complication.
But that's just my opinion, so FWIW.
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 9:09 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] lib/igt_device_scan: add filer card=all Kamil Konieczny
2022-10-18 9:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/igt_device_scan: refactor filer adding Kamil Konieczny
2022-10-18 15:12 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-10-18 15:13 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-10-18 9:10 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] lib/igt_device_scan: add card=all filter selector Kamil Konieczny
2022-10-18 10:56 ` Petri Latvala
2022-10-18 9:38 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for lib/igt_device_scan: add filer card=all Patchwork
2022-10-18 9:51 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning " Patchwork
2022-10-18 16:06 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-10-19 11:43 ` Kamil Konieczny
2022-10-21 8:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2022-10-19 8:25 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7220fa85-ade4-2e9a-abb2-2df6dc2387cf@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.