From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 3993FE00D38; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:45:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.221.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com [209.85.221.51]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD69E00920 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id o18so12667900wrv.13 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:45:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WzE4EMoonxA9Y20CoWAwqK87B0WtLdhueiw2d89e5dQ=; b=emE5OBvWD2GZIOkUz/3gLSLtHohLCgrHte9oEdNS+PgInQCViGJ3MQqc+8Ri0Ih1Ly pvxg8Wj/GBhFr47rbD3k7OYxaB6uWv8KtZ8eOZRycx10Q7ErlkR6dqvcB/39ToXix8jb AdjmBD3rMVJ24eoez9W9vnoiCSMt5x4cQX0l4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WzE4EMoonxA9Y20CoWAwqK87B0WtLdhueiw2d89e5dQ=; b=f3zxEAwizVes4OqLiPmXiqBeMDJeSzoymrA5paOYV3syn+VNnRUHe9KVZHlEZDCjh5 bu2DC4abJtostLMyxVekksPdiiVZTa3AQ+6miMKZNLEsB9SA9k1Aam7Lp7ffj8V8Xc6+ RYDBbpQ3L55cPprL/9H3fEHrwrV0gsptTXteTFMiz6R5qaiWnmO3zt8JYZ4a9+WBDaXA IHgAmjJ8mbMjrvC2EFMB6IxxVJHVTgmiaAoeQayNwd3vERNqoIeEt4UmksQT2OzfcmaN bZslQGU9/N2y6Db1n/28nPWh4fTA3PnICBsk9V4q0zHVNNLPgsZ+31mj2Hv42A7TLkmG 3xXw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWTeveMHWBcX7Rxa0b90EHvI490QfZ2nwq8QcXFgO9CML2n3XKW IIrd8GQCEUJO2s8yr6zODdnLUg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8mQt1sr2OTAVzFbe7vWidNvEwCA2U0aNNGY4eTmCgSCMhdZnWlXksas8ft4gSUhO4XgvObw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f008:: with SMTP id j8mr20983444wro.75.1569224739646; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hex (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com. [87.81.244.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y186sm22499676wmb.41.2019.09.23.00.45.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <726da48bae7285caade355afd47c57208dfd6742.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org To: "Jain, Sangeeta" , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , "Tummalapalli, Vineela" Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:45:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20190920050052.0C767E00D8F@yocto-www.yoctoproject.org> <9DDD2658D1FE414E99172D2DB1E4D0434823F10E@PGSMSX109.gar.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.33.4-1build1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "otavio@ossystems.com.br" , "Chan, Aaron Chun Yew" , "akuster808@gmail.com" Subject: Re: QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.8_M3.rc1) X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 07:45:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 07:37 +0000, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > Hi Richard, > > LSB support was expected to be removed from build 'yocto-2.8_M3.rc1' > onwards, but link on AB still points to LSB images. > The images present inside > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-2.8_M3.rc1/machines/genericx86-64-lsb/ > are built with systemd as init manager. > > Can you please confirm if these are altcfg images and the link name > needs to updated? Well spotted! I can confirm these are altcfg images which have systemd as the init manager. For backwards compatibility the autobuilder target names didn't change but the configuration they're built with did. I hadn't realised this would be visible in the release so we may need to think about that for M4 but they are altcfg images. [Added Vineela to cc:] Cheers, Richard