Re: [yocto-patches] [pseudo][PATCH v2 2/2] nftw, ftw: add tests

["Ferry Toth" <fntoth@gmail.com>]

Hi Mark,

Op 08-04-2025 om 18:06 schreef Mark Hatle:
> 
> 
> On 4/8/25 9:33 AM, Gyorgy Sarvari via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> On 4/7/25 21:14, Gyorgy Sarvari via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>>> +#if !defined(__USE_LARGEFILE64) && FTW_NAME == ftw64
>>> +return 0
>>> +#endif
>> If nothing else, at the very least a semicolon is missing in this short
>> path when the call is not available (and in its nftw64 pair). Will keep
>> it in mind to fix - won't submit a v3 only with this on my own.
> 
> Thanks, I'll add this to my local merge for review and testing.

Tested-by: Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>

This is an import patch for walnascar and master. The reason is that 
walnascar already (even though it is not released) has btrfs-tools 6.13 
which will not generate bootable images without this patch.

Also, scarthgap has btrfs-tools 6.7.1 which creates an image with errors 
(2000 in my case, or maybe it stops counting). Luckily that image boots.

But scarthgap being LTS imho should have a backported btrfs-tools and 
because of that also pseudo with this patch or similar.

I tested this on Intel Edison scarthgap with this patch in a bbappend 
(and the other pseudo patches refreshed and git formatted).

> --Mark
> 
>>
>> 
>>
>