From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Friedrich.Ewaldt@gmx.de Subject: Re: Terratec DMX XFire DSP Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 13:00:06 +0200 (MEST) Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <7280.1028286006@www26.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by alsa.alsa-project.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with SMTP id NAA01892 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 13:00:38 +0200 Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Benny Sjostrand Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi Benny, I'm quite sure. Have a look at the following link <;-) ftp://ftp.terratec.de/Audio/DMXXfire/Images/DMXXFire1024_Board_L.jpg >>regarding your cs46xx DSP and codec list: >>AFAIK the Xfire card has got a CS4624 DSP, not a CS4630. The main (only?) >>difference should be the processing power (CS4624: 255MIPS, CS4630: >>420MIPS). > >Are you sure ? >If the Windows system properties tells say that's a CS4624 it can be >becourse >it uses the same driver for both cs4630 and cs4624, as they are binary >compatible. >If you do a "lspci" on Linux it will probably say that it's cs4624/ >..SoundFusion (something), but does >not mean that the device really has a cs4624. >Just sounds strange for me that Terratec have choosen the cs4624 .... (It was probably cheaper. The XFire was a competitive product to the Soundblaster1024. It was about 100DM ~ 50EU ~ 50$) regards fritz_e -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf