All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
	sdf@fomichev.me, bobbyeshleman@meta.com, almasrymina@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:  Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: devmem: replace gen_pool with freelist
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:58:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7286d84a0b3b4098219acc0cf9803e6e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178993807798.2160803.6987249829072277558@kernel.org>

> gen_pool_free() -> gen_pool_free_owner() -> bitmap_clear_ll()
> 	BUG_ON(remain);
>
> Reaching this requires a separate page_pool refcount bug, since
> mp_dmabuf_devmem_release_page() rejects refcount != 1, so this is
> only a loss of a fail-stop diagnostic. Is dropping that check
> intentional to match io_uring zcrx, which uses the same unguarded
> LIFO?

Working as intended. A duplicate return already violates page_pool ownership.

> This is a pre-existing issue and not introduced here, since the
> return value of page_pool_set_dma_addr_netmem() is dropped.
>
> Would it be worth failing the bind here as well?

I plan to follow up with 2 more patches to cleanup freelist and will
fix it there (convert to the helpers). Let's consider this a pre-existing
issue that I'll fix separately?

> [Severity: Medium]
> Can this walk overrun owner->area.niovs[], binding->freelist[] and
> binding->tx_vec[]?
>
> Would adding the sum check or the post-loop equality check be
> worthwhile?

Same feedback as on patch 1: let's not do defensive programming. We
do have a contract where dmabuf->len == sum(sg->len) and it is
maintained for the in-tree dmabufs.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-17 18:11 [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: devmem: remove gen_pool from dma-buf allocations Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-17 18:11 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: devmem: replace gen_pool with freelist Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 21:01   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-21 16:58     ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-09-21 23:29   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-21 23:34   ` Mina Almasry
2026-09-17 18:11 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: devmem: embed net_iov_area in binding Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 21:01   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-21 16:58     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-17 18:11 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: devmem: batch net_iov allocations into the page_pool cache Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-21 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: devmem: remove gen_pool from dma-buf allocations patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7286d84a0b3b4098219acc0cf9803e6e@gmail.com \
    --to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.