From: Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Issue with max_threads (and other resources) and highmem
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:19:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72940000.1003868385@baldur> (raw)
I recently had pointed out to me that the default value for max_threads (ie
the max number of tasks per system) doesn't work right on machines with
lots of memory.
A quick examination of fork_init() shows that max_threads is supposed to be
limited so its stack/task_struct takes no more than half of physical
memory. This calculation ignores the fact that task_structs must be
allocated from the normal pool and not the highmem pool, which is a clear
bug. On a machine with enough physical memory it's possible for all of
normal memory to be allocated to task_structs, which tends to make the
machine die.
fork_init() gets its knowledge of physical memory passed in from
start_kernel(), which sets it from mum_physpages. This parameter is also
passed to several other init functions.
My question boils down to this... Should we change start_kernel() to limit
the physical memory size it passes to the init functions to not include
high memory, or should we only do it for fork_init()? What is the best way
to do calculate this number? I don't see any simple way in
architecture-independent code to get the size of high memory vs normal
memory.
What's the best approach here?
Thanks,
Dave McCracken
======================================================================
Dave McCracken IBM Linux Base Kernel Team 1-512-838-3059
dmccr@us.ibm.com T/L 678-3059
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-23 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-23 20:19 Dave McCracken [this message]
2001-10-23 20:36 ` Issue with max_threads (and other resources) and highmem Andi Kleen
2001-10-23 20:46 ` Dave McCracken
2001-10-23 20:52 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-23 21:05 ` Dave McCracken
2001-10-23 21:59 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-23 23:30 Dan Kegel
2001-10-23 23:35 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-24 0:00 ` Dan Kegel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72940000.1003868385@baldur \
--to=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.