From: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
To: Santhosh Reddy Guddati <santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>, <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v1 1/2] tests/kms_async_flips: Split subtest to handle linear buffers separately
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:13:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72f2853d-e245-4651-a4e2-9952eb99690c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415155136.2879045-2-santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com>
Hi Santhosh,
On 4/15/2025 9:21 PM, Santhosh Reddy Guddati wrote:
> As linear buffers are considered corner cases, split the existing subtests
> run_with_modifiers to handle as a separate subtest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santhosh Reddy Guddati <santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_async_flips.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_async_flips.c b/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> index 031417ed8..df3e136b7 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_async_flips.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,14 @@
> *
> * SUBTEST: overlay-atomic
> * Description: Verify overlay planes with async flips in atomic API
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events-linear
> + * Description: Verify the async flip functionality and the fps during async flips
> + * with linear modifier
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: async-flip-with-page-flip-events-atomic-linear
> + * Description: Verify the async flip functionality and the fps during async flips
> + * with linear modifier in Atomic API
> */
Please rename the existing test to '-tiled'.
>
> #define CURSOR_POS 128
> @@ -128,6 +136,7 @@ typedef struct {
> struct buf_ops *bops;
> bool atomic_path;
> bool overlay_path;
> + bool linear_modifier;
> } data_t;
>
> static void flip_handler(int fd_, unsigned int sequence, unsigned int tv_sec,
> @@ -266,6 +275,7 @@ static void test_init_ops(data_t *data)
> data->alternate_sync_async = false;
> data->atomic_path = false;
> data->overlay_path = false;
> + data->linear_modifier = false;
> }
>
> static void test_init_fbs(data_t *data)
> @@ -792,15 +802,23 @@ static void run_test_with_modifiers(data_t *data, void (*test)(data_t *))
> test_init(data);
>
> for (int i = 0; i < data->plane->format_mod_count; i++) {
> + uint64_t modifier = data->plane->modifiers[i];
> +
> if (data->plane->formats[i] != DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888)
> continue;
>
> + if (data->linear_modifier && modifier != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!data->linear_modifier && modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR)
> + continue;
> +
> data->allow_fail = true;
> - data->modifier = data->plane->modifiers[i];
> + data->modifier = modifier;
>
> igt_dynamic_f("pipe-%s-%s-%s", kmstest_pipe_name(data->pipe),
> data->output->name,
> - igt_fb_modifier_name(data->modifier)) {
> + igt_fb_modifier_name(modifier)) {
> /*
> * FIXME: joiner+async flip is busted currently in KMD.
> * Remove this check once the issues are fixed in KMD.
> @@ -863,6 +881,25 @@ igt_main
> run_test(&data, test_async_flip);
> }
>
> + igt_describe("Wait for page flip events in between successive asynchronous "
> + "flips with linear modifiers");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events-linear") {
> + test_init_ops(&data);
> + data.linear_modifier = true;
> + igt_require(is_intel_device(data.drm_fd));
> + run_test_with_modifiers(&data, test_async_flip);
> + }
> +
> + igt_describe("Wait for page flip events in between successive asynchronous "
> + "flips using atomic path with linear modifiers");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("async-flip-with-page-flip-events-atomic-linear") {
> + test_init_ops(&data);
> + data.atomic_path = true;
> + data.linear_modifier = true;
> + igt_require(is_intel_device(data.drm_fd));
This would always skip on non-intel platforms? Is that the intention as
linear should be supported on all?
I think can reverse this and we can make tiled subtest intel specific as
even now we call run_test which eventually will have linear modifier itself?
Regards,
Karthik.B.S
> + run_test_with_modifiers(&data, test_async_flip);
> + }
> +
> igt_describe("Alternate between sync and async flips");
> igt_subtest_with_dynamic("alternate-sync-async-flip") {
> test_init_ops(&data);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-15 15:51 [PATCH i-g-t v1 0/2] Async flips with tiled modifiers Santhosh Reddy Guddati
2025-04-15 15:51 ` [PATCH i-g-t v1 1/2] tests/kms_async_flips: Split subtest to handle linear buffers separately Santhosh Reddy Guddati
2025-04-16 12:43 ` Karthik B S [this message]
2025-04-15 15:51 ` [PATCH i-g-t v1 2/2] tests/kms_async_flips: Use tiling modifiers Santhosh Reddy Guddati
2025-04-16 12:10 ` Karthik B S
2025-04-16 0:07 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Async flips with tiled modifiers Patchwork
2025-04-16 0:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-16 5:42 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-16 9:29 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72f2853d-e245-4651-a4e2-9952eb99690c@intel.com \
--to=karthik.b.s@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.