From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965295AbWHOIV2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:21:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965294AbWHOIV2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:21:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:15854 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965286AbWHOIV1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:21:27 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060815013114.GS29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20060815013114.GS29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20060814211504.27190.10491.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060814211509.27190.51352.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Al Viro Cc: David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RHEL5 PATCH 2/4] VFS: Make inode numbers 64-bits X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:21:11 +0100 Message-ID: <7303.1155630071@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Al Viro wrote: > NAK. There's no need to touch i_ino and a lot of reasons for not doing > that. ->getattr() can fill 64bit field just fine without that and there's > zero need to touch every fs out there *and* add cycles on icache lookups. > WTF for? That doesn't fix getdents64() though... David