From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.233.182.187] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gtsh2-0002j8-3I for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:28:12 +0100 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l24so30384nfc for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:26:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.41.12 with SMTP id t12mr132692nfj.1165872401427; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:26:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from CUBE ( [82.193.96.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g1sm408810nfe.2006.12.11.13.26.40; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:26:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:26:42 +0200 From: Paul Sokolovsky X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <7310051684.20061211232642@gmail.com> To: Marcin Juszkiewicz In-Reply-To: <200612112150.15571.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> References: <456B0DC2.90300@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <444521399.20061208175939@vanille-media.de> <1165789899.5604.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200612112150.15571.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: To be removed recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:28:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Marcin, Monday, December 11, 2006, 10:50:15 PM, you wrote: > Dnia niedziela, 10 grudnia 2006 23:31, Richard Purdie napisa=B3: >> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 17:59 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: >> > Richard Purdie wrote: >> > >> Package Name: bluez*2.* >> > >> Reason: Obsolete by, and conflicts with bluez 3.7 >> > > >> > > Fine with me. >> > >> > This can be a problem for Opie, since we used the no-dbus version for >> > quite some time to save space. >> >> In that case we can't remove the no-dbus version needed by opie. > Does someone tested OPIE with dbus version at all? How much does extra > packages take etc? Without such testing sentence 'do not remove=20 > bluez*nodbus because OPIE needs it' does not have sense. > I also would like to get rid of bluez 2.x because it will be unmaintained > software soon due to fact that everyone switched to 3.x versions. I agree here, but removing it in such manner hardly helpful either. Is anything magic in those 2 weeks which are given stuff in removal.txt? We can have 1 month, 2 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year removal periods. That "6 months" fits bluez2 pretty well, IMHO. --=20 Best regards, Paul mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com