From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f180.google.com (mail-pl1-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC4FB12FF6D for ; Fri, 17 May 2024 18:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715970532; cv=none; b=WZXUpqjN4aTEmfT6bZIlpRtE2iEO5D+pHCAE+dOb/qVwsT3aB40FApjVvtURa1Z9Gxahcs+2Ks1+DDH02YVn/9Jin0KA1rFcrC+vQqUFOt7M3FSUnNcRPrdIR1Qebl8EfvZbljYqFzyTEvlkm0S4d1eTKrSjpQTNaqCw95BACXw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715970532; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rYtiioXMHmYavMppBfFS5QiHlYTuq/NUg+9iFS4M2pk=; h=Content-Type:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-ID: Date:MIME-Version; b=KO4hPG6Hr1EZsxU8gjmpKStFri6TrpM/kuSM3HxeiI6NvDb+gdSb/BJvntDDr/4JE/ien6eozUtY7/QxFgPrIfWvYnYejtyJzt/v45bdKQ0SKlxKfpaPq5ttrTOkMs7zp6lX/40ze3OK1kcQgzqs7fgXMO+9CcoLAXjIl1gfw0Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=DhdlttFO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="DhdlttFO" Received: by mail-pl1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1eca195a7c8so17829665ad.2 for ; Fri, 17 May 2024 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1715970530; x=1716575330; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=mime-version:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:subject :references:in-reply-to:reply-to:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=r4vEgko1NpmTbp1aeBGmxTveQeSXJUGn5DBHdak8Bi0=; b=DhdlttFO57SjXhrtGdBuoPg/9ZGLczDcCa5THLgd/JCorOkPfsm67QoyXnoMF3946z vQT/wMokkPAR1gHZ2iU5vdK9Ix9d+o+9fETd63iFkEjvEU9WuxJXoDwoq36YGsb2OkWk 0o+UcvpSHsaYRxWalnR4IJV+Gm3o/yb2zinoVprnuJBqZ3R8JFU5LNzoeSUTInzLa2X5 LOwl4MOt9zmoVH5YTkVoVUTxG9qMkiZeAftvTWh/DB7Vldp7RCnHsOVqGf68drJEwGYc iKklChUsD3gOoJmNSFWNpC0y8gI6QcV0vodZdd+tLKnICYnzHo/a5xe4yV03lSRkL6PG Somg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715970530; x=1716575330; h=mime-version:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:subject :references:in-reply-to:reply-to:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=r4vEgko1NpmTbp1aeBGmxTveQeSXJUGn5DBHdak8Bi0=; b=VxhKiugb9mC1cnVbRUs28+i8d/hd8WBZB++yYPYbNE/qinKbnhzIEFQmlXeDKW5fA7 +eai+cZKajr7+ASHbhrnejqr5yflc7ripuR3TsrsaLHHRih66D8g0ckWCNFj2yTocRN1 aA8OB6EGynCHEJWHbuXJyBM1kMrVFhvHpq7HXHtsVXAZ9jJ/C04/yM73KdF/HsomBPaz PhrxF/MxprBAtNqC44KW6sKke654wJspB09N86ksxOaQCn9RyKwp2BToAegGcpruzud1 HdGlgR7pSm1msidU++N7vHE08ZvetVEAjnyUlfdZds2pbwMC2N/cAi8n1Yw/HXHKAIo3 de1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzRdRQr2v8Lh1jRQfDdeg9ZwDDQv0X+4j/X3uyWwK8JXFad8c98 fojC8jV92J+uTrqIWLV5RjLs5t4kysIn1p4HJD2iiSCkG7fa+fA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHSh6wZaEUn2/jcDYEZWkccxrFphJOY7rH7oJ8EEfsP/ohDysUYJObi4mc82ias0vnsYDYDcw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:da87:b0:1eb:7334:1228 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1ef43c0f666mr305875405ad.3.1715970530117; Fri, 17 May 2024 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([52.234.33.249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1ef0c03700esm159558055ad.217.2024.05.17.11.28.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 May 2024 11:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: MPTCP CI To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev Reply-To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20240517-mptcp-doc-v1-0-fc1ef063584e@kernel.org> References: <20240517-mptcp-doc-v1-0-fc1ef063584e@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 0/3] doc: introduce MPTCP global doc Message-ID: <7340e627-b26a-cbfd-dbf9-d3fb99ff2b2a@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 18:28:48 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Matthieu, Thank you for your modifications, that's great! Our CI did some validations and here is its report: - KVM Validation: normal: Success! =E2=9C=85 - KVM Validation: debug: = Success! =E2=9C=85 - KVM Validation: btf (only bpftest_all): Success! = =E2=9C=85 - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/r= uns/9132273070 Initiator: Patchew Applier Commits: https://github.= com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/8d1e5a53dec8 Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=3D854078 If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same = environment as the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.: $ cd [kernel source code] $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w = "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \ --pull always = mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \ auto-normal For more details: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virt= me-docker Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already= done to have a stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, = it is possible some reported issues are not due to your modifications. = Still, do not hesitate to help us improve that ;-) Cheers, MPTCP GH Action bot Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 = Core)