From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE00DE006C7 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2012 09:38:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="144103583" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.122]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2012 09:38:13 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Andrea Galbusera , poky@yoctoproject.org Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:38:11 +0100 Message-ID: <74169790.jigKjBi9LZ@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.2 (Linux/3.0.0-17-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <4F5B73E6.9040908@mlbassoc.com> <1856275.4JdY7aZveN@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Poky doesn't play nice with meta-oe X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:38:15 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday 20 April 2012 18:01:54 Andrea Galbusera wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > That's not an unreasonable approach for now. However we do really want to > > tidy up meta-oe such that it doesn't do surprising things when you enable > > it. Hopefully we will get a chance to make progress on this over the next > > few months. > > Before starting to mess up things I'm asking if there is any relevant > improvement on this side? I need a few recipes that are in meta-oe but > not in poky/yocto (python-twisted, gpsd and a few more). Enabling > meta-oe over my current edison environment would be nice to avoid > manually importing those recipes with dependencies. Maybe master > branch and upcoming 1.2 are expected to work better on this side? No major progress as yet, I've been busy with things leading up to the 1.2 release; however once that's out the door there should be more time available for improving meta-oe. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre