From: Skywind <gnuwind@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is kernel 2.6.11 adjust tcp_max_syn_backlog incorrectly?
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:45:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75052be70506061745478abdf5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Any one know the reason?
I think the subject may change to
"Is kernel 2.6.11 havn't set /proc network variable"
or
"Kernel 2.6.11 havn't set /proc network variable correctly by mem size"
> Is kernel 2.6.11 adjust tcp_max_syn_backlog incorrectly?
>
> Test Backgroud:
> CPU: Intel P4
> Mem: 512Mb
> The /etc/sysctl.conf and other haven't touch anything.
>
> I found a strange question: when I use kernel 2.6.11, the value of
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_syn_backlog is 256,
> while kernel 2.6.10 on same computer the value is 1024.
>
> So I check the net/ipv4/[tcp.c, tcp_ipv4.c] and know when Mem >= 256Mb
> the tcp_max_syn_backlog will be set to 1024,
> but it is 256 in my test above.
> Some other variables that should be adjust all together with
> tcp_max_syn_backlog are:
> ip_local_port_range
> tcp_max_tw_buckets
> tcp_max_orphans
> But they don't be adjust to correctly value(refer to net/ipv4/tcp.c) all.
>
> It seems that kernel don't adjust these value automatic, is this a bug?
>
> I guess the mechanism of tcp.c in 2.6.11 have some changes(between
> 2.6.10), and it conduce to this result,
> Is this guess correctly?
> Xu Gang (Skywind)
> 2005/06/06
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-07 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-07 0:45 Skywind [this message]
[not found] <75052be7050606070691c302d@mail.gmail.com>
2005-06-06 14:10 ` Is kernel 2.6.11 adjust tcp_max_syn_backlog incorrectly? Skywind
2005-06-11 10:25 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-13 21:24 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75052be70506061745478abdf5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gnuwind@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.