From: nick@nhthomas.freeserve.co.uk
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Wifi signal level differences
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:51:44 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7566504.38231368021104217.JavaMail.www@wwinf3714> (raw)
Hi,
I have an Atheros ath6kl_usb based wifi dongle.
I am using it with an embedded project.
The driver code can be built for either X86 or sh4 hardware - so I can also use the same USB wifi dongle on my Fedora 12 Linux PC or plugged in to the embedded device.
It's working fine in both situations.
But, I notice that the signal level reported in /proc/net/wireless is slightly different between the two units.
Note, I am using the same physical Atheros wifi dongle, and moving it from one device to the other to this test.
I notice that when using the X86 PC I see a signal level of -61, which is marginally better than the -66 I see in the embedded device.
I know that this isn't an exact science - but using a short USB extension lead I can orientate the wifi dongle to be in the same place and orientation when plugged in to either device.
So, I would expect the wifi signal strength to be reported the same !?
I know there are many differences between my Fedora 12 PC, and the embedded STLinux project - not least that the driver is compiled using different compilers.
But, I was wondering what else could explain the difference in signal levels between the two?
Also, which part of the driver code is responsible for reading/calculating the signal level value?
Regards
Nick
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-08 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-08 13:51 nick [this message]
2013-05-08 14:29 ` Wifi signal level differences Dan Williams
2013-05-08 14:42 ` nick
2013-05-15 13:19 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7566504.38231368021104217.JavaMail.www@wwinf3714 \
--to=nick@nhthomas.freeserve.co.uk \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.