From: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Wenxiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: re attach-ns causing IO errors
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:49:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75700e85137a40305238c74cf03bb677@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi All,
We discussed this at the beginning of November last year.
Test team with extra ns-rescan, get new namespace back last year.
But they still ask if there is way not doing extra ns-rescan.
Consider this scenario with nguid changes:
# nvme list-subsys
nvme-subsys0 -
NQN=nqn.1994-11.com.samsung:nvme:PM1743:2.5-inch:S7DDNG0X100093
\
+- nvme0 pcie 052a:58:00.0 live
+- nvme1 pcie 058a:58:00.0 live
After system boots up:
Nvme-subsys0 -> ns_head(NSID1/NGUID1)
/dev/nvme0n1 -> ns_head(NSID1/NGUID1) ->ns(NSID1/NGUID1)
/dev/nvme1 -> ns_head(NSID1/NGUID1) ->ns(NSID1/NGUID1)
After delete-ns /dev/nvme0 -n 1 -c 0x82:
Nvme-subsy0 -> no more ns_head(EMPTY)
/dev/nvme0 -> no ns(EMPTY)
/dev/nvme1 -> no ns(EMPTY)
create-ns /dev/nvme0 -s 0x5000000 -c 0x5000000 -f 0 -d 0 -m 1:
After attach-ns /dev/nvme0 -n 1 -c 0x82: I saw calling
nvme_scan_ns_list() twice.
1st scan: nvme_queue_scan() -> nvme_scan_ns_list(), we got:
Nvme-subsy0 -> ns_head(NSID1/NGUID1) -------> Note: this is old NGUID1
/dev/nvme0 -> ns_head(NSID1/NGUID1) ->ns(NSID1/NGUID1) ----> Note: this
is old NGUID1
2nd scan: scan_work() -> nvme_scan_ns_list, we got:
Nvme-subsys0 ->ns_head(NSID1/NGUID1) ----> created this ns_head in 1st
scan.
/dev/nvme0n1 -> ns_head(NSID1/NGUID1) -> ns(NSID1/NGUID2)
Then saw: nvme nvme0: identifiers changed for nsid 1 ---> because of
NGUID changed to NGUID2
block nvme0n1: no available path - failing I/O
block nvme0n1: no available path - failing I/O
My question is:
- Looks only scan once during system boot up.
- Why scan twice when did delete-ns/create-ns/attach operation? 1st
scan: Nvme_queue_scan is called from user space or udev?
- 1st scan, NGUID1 is old one, 2nd scan, NGUID2 is new one?
Thanks for your help!
Wendy
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-19 22:49 Wen Xiong [this message]
2024-02-20 1:28 ` re attach-ns causing IO errors Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75700e85137a40305238c74cf03bb677@linux.ibm.com \
--to=wenxiong@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=wenxiong@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.